State v. De Abreu
| Citation | 613 So.2d 453 |
| Decision Date | 04 February 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 79569,79569 |
| Parties | 18 Fla. L. Week. S103 STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Douglas DE ABREU, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
No appearance, for respondent.
We originally accepted jurisdiction of De Abreu v. State, 593 So.2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA1991), based on apparent conflict with State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla.1987). On consideration of the record and briefs, we perceive that the opinion under review here is based upon the rules changes adopted by our decision In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 536 So.2d 992 (Fla.1988), which superseded Ginebra to the extent of any inconsistency. Accordingly, there is no conflict, and we conclude that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. This review is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dickey v. State, Case No. 1D03-2489 (FL 2/15/2005), Case No. 1D03-2489.
...be found ineffective for failing to advise of collateral consequences of the plea), superseded by rule on other grounds, State v. De Abreu, 613 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 1993). A direct consequence is one which has a "definite, immediate, and largely automatic effect on the range of the defendant's ......
-
Major v. State
...See State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla. 1987), superseded on other grounds by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172; State v. De Abreu, 613 So.2d 453, 453 (1993) (holding "In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 536 So.2d 992 (Fla.1988) ... supersede[s] Ginebra to the ......
-
State v. Seraphin
...we established rule 3.172(c)(8). We subsequently acknowledged that our old case law was superseded by the new rule in State v. De Abreu, 613 So.2d 453 (1993) ("In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 536 So.2d 992 (Fla.1988),... supersede[s] Ginebra to the extent of any [No......
-
State v. Dickey
...960-61 (Fla.1987), superseded by In re Amendments to Fla. Rules of Crim. Pro., 536 So.2d 992 (Fla.1988), as recognized in State v. DeAbreu, 613 So.2d 453 (Fla.1993). However, in Major v. State, 814 So.2d 424, 426-27 (Fla.2002), we reiterated that the law does not require a defendant to be i......