State v. Bolin, 26494.
Decision Date | 19 May 2008 |
Docket Number | No. 26494.,26494. |
Citation | 378 S.C. 96,662 S.E.2d 38 |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | The STATE, Appellant, v. Berry Scott BOLIN, Respondent. |
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, Assistant Attorney General S. Creighton Waters, of Columbia; and Kevin Scott Brackett, Solicitor, of York, for appellant.
Leland B. Greeley, of Rock Hill, for respondent.
Respondent was indicted for murder, assault and battery with intent to kill, possession of a firearm during commission of a violent offense, assault with intent to kill, discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle, and possession of a pistol by a person under 21 years of age pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 16-23-30 (2003 & Supp.2007).
Respondent argued that the possession of a pistol indictment should be quashed because § 16-23-30(B) under which he was charged is unconstitutional. The motion to quash was granted by the trial court. The State appeals and we affirm.
Did the trial court err by quashing the indictment for possession of a handgun while under the age of 21 on the ground that the criminal statute making such possession illegal is unconstitutional?
When the issue is the constitutionality of a statute, every presumption will be made in favor of its validity and no statute will be declared unconstitutional unless its invalidity appears so clearly as to leave no doubt that it conflicts with the constitution. State v. Gaster, 349 S.C. 545, 564 S.E.2d 87 (2002). This presumption places the initial burden on the party challenging the constitutionality of the legislation to show it violates a provision of the Constitution. State v. White, 348 S.C. 532, 560 S.E.2d 420, cert. denied, 537 U.S. 825, 123 S.Ct. 114, 154 L.Ed.2d 37 (2002).
Section 16-23-30(A) provides:
[i]t is unlawful for a person to knowingly sell, offer to sell, deliver, lease, rent, barter, exchange, or transport for sale into this State any handgun to: (3) a person under the age of twenty-one, but this shall not apply to the issue of handguns to members of the [military or other like organizations or to those receiving instruction on handgun use under the immediate supervision of a parent or adult instructor].
Subsection (B) states that "[i]t is unlawful for a person enumerated in subsection (A) to possess or acquire handguns within this State."1
Respondent argues that because he was old enough to be sui juris and the state constitution granted him the right to bear arms, then he could not be charged with a crime for handgun possession. See S.C. Const. Art. I, § 20 ( ).
The portions of § 16-23-30 regarding persons under the age of 21 do not violate the constitutional right of a person under the age of 21 to keep and bear arms. While a person under the age of 21 is prohibited from possessing a handgun, except in certain circumstances, this does not prevent a person under the age of 21 from possessing other types of guns. Our constitution simply requires that a persons right to keep and bear "arms" not be infringed upon. The legislatures regulation of who may have access to handguns does not infringe upon that right because persons under the age of 21 have access to other types of guns. Cf. State v. Johnson, 76 S.C. 39, 56 S.E. 544 (1907) ( ); State v. Johnson, 16 S.C. 187 (1881) ( ).2 Accordingly, § 16-23-30 does not violate S.C. Const. Art. I, § 20, regarding a persons right to keep and bear arms.
Respondent further argues that § 16-23-30 violates the state constitution because the age group of 18- to 20-year-olds is being treated differently than adults aged 21 and above. South Carolina Const. Art. XVII, § 14, provides:
Every citizen who is eighteen years of age or older, not laboring under disabilities prescribed in this Constitution or otherwise established by law, shall be deemed sui juris and endowed with full legal rights and responsibilities, provided, that the General Assembly may restrict the sale of alcoholic beverages to persons until age twenty-one.
Article XVII, § 14, specifically makes reference to the fact the General Assembly can restrict the sale of alcoholic beverages to persons until age 21. By expressly allowing the regulation of the sale of alcoholic beverages to the 18- to 20-year-old age group and not stating any other situation in which the General Assembly may restrict the rights of this age group, the state constitution precludes the General Assembly from prohibiting this age...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Misch
...have concluded that their constitutions protect a right to bear arms for individual self-defense. See, e.g., State v. Bolin, 378 S.C. 96, 662 S.E.2d 38, 39 (2008) (implicitly concluding that provision that "a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right ......
-
McDonald v. City of Chi.
... ... App. 1617; Brief for State Firearm Associations as Amici Curiae 2021; Brief for State of Texas et al. as Amici Curiae 78 ... Bolin 378 S.C. 96, 99, 662 S.E.2d 38, 39 (2008) (ban on handgun possession by persons under 21 did not ... ...
-
Planned Parenthood S. Atl. v. State
... ... questions regarding the Judicial Merit Selection Commission); ... State v. Bolin , 378 S.C. 96, 100, 662 S.E.2d 38, ... 39-40 (2008) (analyzing whether article XVII, section 14 ... permits the State to ban possession ... ...
-
Planned Parenthood S. Atl. v. State
...S.E.2d 453, 457, 464 (2010) (resolving purely legal questions regarding the Judicial Merit Selection Commission); State v. Bolin , 378 S.C. 96, 100, 662 S.E.2d 38, 39-40 (2008) (analyzing whether article XVII, section 14 permits the State to ban possession of a handgun while under the age o......
-
THE LAW OF EMERGING ADULTS.
...[https://perma.cc/N4QF-X43L]. (171.) S.C. Const, art. XVII, [section] 14 (emphasis added). (172.) State v. Bolin, 662 S.E.2d 38, 39 40 (S.C. 2008). In this case, the South Carolina Supreme Court held, in a brief judgment, without much further explanation, [b]y expressly allowing the regulat......