State v. Bowen, 217A84

Decision Date02 October 1984
Docket NumberNo. 217A84,217A84
Citation320 S.E.2d 405,312 N.C. 79
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Carlton Kent BOWEN.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Raleigh by T. Byron Smith, Associate Atty., Goldsboro, for the state.

Alexander, Wright, Parrish, Hinshaw & Tash by Robert D. Hinshaw, Winston-Salem, for defendant.

PER CURIAM.

There being no issue before this Court for review as required by Rule 16(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeal is

DISMISSED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State Of North Carolina v. Hopper
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 6, 2010
    ...where evidence was conflicting but concluding that evidence was “sufficient to take the case to the jury”), appeal dismissed, 312 N.C. 79, 320 S.E.2d 405 (1984); see also State v. Mikolinski, 56 Conn.App. 252, 261, 742 A.2d 1264, 1270 (1999) (“The question of whether a roadway is a public h......
  • State v. Snyder
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1996
    ...essential elements of the offense charged. See State v. Bowen, 67 N.C. App. 512, 515, 313 S.E.2d 196, 197, appeal dismissed, 312 N.C. 79, 320 S.E.2d 405 (1984). However, there simply has to be an allegation of a situs that is included within the parameters of N.C.G.S. § 20-138.1(a) that def......
  • State v. Hamilton, 8520SC185
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • October 29, 1985
    ...doubt is a peremptory instruction appropriate. State v. Bowen, 67 N.C.App. 512, 313 S.E.2d 196, appeal dismissed, 312 N.C. 79, 320 S.E.2d 405 (1984) (per curiam). That was not the situation here and the court correctly refused to give the requested D Defendant also argues under this assignm......
  • State v. Lamb
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 5, 2011
    ...PVA, this issue must be submitted to the jury. State v. Bowen, 67 N.C. App. 512, 514-15, 313 S.E.2d 196, 197, appeal dismissed, 312 N.C. 79, 320 S.E.2d 405 (1984). Defendant did not request a jury instruction on the definition of a PVA, nor did defendant object after hearing the trial court......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT