State v. Boyer, 84-946

Decision Date28 June 1985
Docket NumberNo. 84-946,84-946
Citation220 Neb. 312,369 N.W.2d 644
PartiesSTATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. William R. BOYER, Appellant.
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court

1. Post Conviction: Appeal and Error. Post conviction relief may not be used for the purpose of securing another review of issues which were raised on direct appeal.

2. Criminal Law: Sentences: Homicide. Imprisonment for life is the minimum penalty for first degree murder.

William R. Boyer, pro se.

Robert M. Spire, Atty. Gen., and Terry R. Schaaf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

KRIVOSHA, C.J., and BOSLAUGH, WHITE, HASTINGS, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, and GRANT, JJ.

CAPORALE, Justice.

Defendant, William R. Boyer, appeals from the denial of relief sought under the Nebraska Post Conviction Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 29-3001 et seq. (Reissue 1979). He asserts as errors the trial court's failure to find (1) that the evidence does not support a finding of guilt for first degree murder and (2) that the sentence is excessive. We affirm.

Following a jury trial, Boyer was adjudged guilty of the first degree murder of his mother under the circumstances set forth in State v. Boyer, 211 Neb. 139, 318 N.W.2d 60 (1982), and was sentenced to imprisonment for life. This court affirmed the judgment and sentence of the trial court. He has since filed two motions for post conviction relief, both of which were dismissed by the district court and both of which constitute the subject of this appeal. Boyer argues the evidence establishes he was guilty only of manslaughter, not first degree murder, and that his sentence is excessive for the crime he committed.

One of the errors assigned in his direct appeal was that the evidence was insufficient to allow submission of the question of guilt to the jury. We held the evidence was such that the jury "could conclude the defendant was lying in wait and therefore planned to kill his mother," and was sufficient to support the conviction. Id. at 148, 318 N.W.2d at 65. Consequently, Boyer is forever barred from presenting an encore performance of the song that the evidence does not support a finding that he committed murder in the first degree.

As has been stated before, " '[t]here must be an end to litigation. A defendant will not be permitted to rephrase issues previously raised ... for the purpose of securing another review on appeal.' " State v. Casper, 219 Neb. 641, 643, 365 N.W.2d 451, 453 (1985), quoting State v. Hochstein, 216 Neb. 515, 344 N.W.2d 469 (1...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Boyer v. Daum
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska
    • January 27, 1987
    ...the court again denied the motion. Boyer appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court, which affirmed the district court. State v. Boyer, 220 Neb. 312, 369 N.W.2d 644 (1985).1 In his federal petition, Boyer raises a number of constitutional claims, including: (1) the evidence was insufficient to ......
  • State v. Hurlburt, 85-074
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1985
    ...relief cannot be used to secure review of issues which either have already been litigated on a direct appeal, see, State v. Boyer, 220 Neb. 312, 369 N.W.2d 644 (1985), and State v. Brown, 220 Neb. 305, 369 N.W.2d (1985), or which were known to defendant and counsel at time of trial, capable......
  • State v. Isikoff
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • August 22, 1986
    ...of issues which have already been litigated on direct appeal. State v. Hurlburt, 221 Neb. 364, 377 N.W.2d 108 (1985); State v. Boyer, 220 Neb. 312, 369 N.W.2d 644 (1985); State v. Brown, 220 Neb. 305, 369 N.W.2d 639 (1985). Those assignments of error will not be We have also stated that iss......
  • State v. Brown, 84-853
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • June 28, 1985
    ...of issues already litigated on direct appeal. State v. Hochstein, 216 Neb. 515, 344 N.W.2d 469 (1984). See, also, State v. Boyer, 220 Neb. 312, 369 N.W.2d 644 (1985). There is no merit to defendant's claim for post conviction relief, and the judgment of the district court in denying the sam......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT