State v. Bright
Decision Date | 16 June 2016 |
Docket Number | No. SC14–1701.,SC14–1701. |
Citation | 200 So.3d 710 |
Parties | STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Raymond BRIGHT, Appellee. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer Lyn Keegan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Appellant/Cross–Appellee.
Joseph Stewart Hamrick, Richard Adam Sichta, and Susanne Kaye Sichta of the Sichta Firm, LLC., Jacksonville, FL, for Appellee/Cross–Appellant.
This is an appeal from an order entered on Raymond Bright's initial motion to vacate his convictions of first-degree murder and sentences of death filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851
. The State of Florida appeals the postconviction court order to the extent that it granted Bright a new penalty phase trial. Bright cross-appealed the postconviction court's order to the extent that it denied his challenges to the convictions. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. As explained below, we affirm the postconviction court's order and remand this case to the circuit court for a new penalty phase proceeding.
A jury convicted Bright for the first-degree murders of Derrick King and Randall Brown. Bright v. State, 90 So.3d 249, 254 (Fla.2012)
. The jury recommended death by a vote of eight to four for the murders of both victims, and the trial court sentenced Bright to death for both murders. Id. at 256.
On direct appeal, we previously detailed the facts leading to Bright's death sentences:
, the ex-wife testified that she and Bright had previously made multiple calls to law enforcement—including the narcotics division of the Jacksonville Sheriff's Department and Crime Stoppers—to report that Bright wanted certain individuals removed from his house because they had essentially taken over the house for the purpose of selling drugs. While one officer suggested that Bright accompany the police to the house and identify the persons who were allegedly dealing drugs, Bright and his ex-wife refused to agree to this proposal because they feared retaliation. [FN. 2]
[FN. 2] Bright's sister, Janice Jones, also testified during the Spencer hearing as to her efforts to remove individuals who were staying in Bright's house. When asked what their names were, she replied Lavelle and Derrick. During the guilt phase, Michael Majors testified that Bright rented a room to an individual named Lavelle Copeland, who was friends with Majors and King. Jones managed to convince Copeland to call her and, when he called, she informed him that she was coming to Jacksonville and would bring the police with her. Copeland responded that he would not leave until Bright paid the money owed to him. When Jones offered to pay the money so that Copeland would leave the house, he responded, Copeland was not at Bright's house on the night of the murders because he was in jail.
After the ex-wife met Bright at the church on the morning of February 19, she called a lawyer and arranged for Bright to speak with homicide detectives the next day. However, at 1:45 a.m. on February 20, law enforcement arrived at the home of the ex-wife and Bright was placed in custody. Subsequent to the arrest, the ex-wife disposed of Bright's bloody clothes because she did not want them in her house.
Bright made statements to separate individuals with regard to what allegedly occurred on the night of the murders. Prior to his arrest, Bright informed friend and former coworker Benjamin Lundy that he had “screwed up” and may have killed two people. Bright told Lundy that the murders occurred after a confrontation erupted when one of the victims accused Bright of stealing drugs. After his arrest, Bright also described the events to Mickey Graham, who was in jail at the same time with Bright on unrelated charges. According to Graham, Lavelle Copeland had moved in with Bright, and he and others were running a crack cocaine operation out of the house. [FN. 3] Bright was afraid of them and felt threatened because they possessed guns. Bright did not want them there and had called the police in an attempt to remove them from the premises.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Woodward v. State
...testimony.'" Saunders v. State, [Ms. CR-13-1064, December 16, 2016] ___ So. 3d ___, ___ (Ala. Crim. App. 2016) (quoting State v. Bright, 200 So. 3d 710, 737 (Fla. 2016)). We note that Woodward argues on appeal that Schenk's testimony would not have been cumulative to the testimony at trial ......
-
Saunders v. State
...postconviction evidence is more elaborate than the trial testimony. See Sweet v. State, 810 So.2d 854, 863 (Fla. 2002)." State v. Bright, 200 So.3d 710, –––– (Fla. 2016). " ‘[T]his Court has held that "even if alternate witnesses could provide more detailed testimony, trial counsel is not i......
-
Hilton v. State
...749. Ineffective assistance may occur if counsel was placed on notice as to mitigation leads but did not pursue them. State v. Bright , 200 So. 3d 710, 732 (Fla. 2016). However, that is not what occurred here. In Hilton's case, trial counsel knew of further mitigation evidence but made a st......
-
Bright v. State
...basis that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in investigating and presenting mitigating evidence. State v. Bright (Bright II) , 200 So. 3d 710, 736 (Fla. 2016). Bright now appeals from the second penalty phase at which a death sentence was imposed for each murder following j......