State v. Brugman
| Decision Date | 25 October 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-02038,90-02038 |
| Citation | 588 So.2d 279 |
| Parties | STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. John Warren BRUGMAN, Appellee. 588 So.2d 279, 16 Fla. L. Week. D2739 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Elaine L. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and William Pena Wells, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellee.
The State of Florida appeals an order dismissing the information charging John Warren Brugman with dealing in stolen property. We reverse the order because there was no competent evidence to support the trial court's ruling.
Brugman filed an unsworn motion to dismiss, arguing that the information charging him with dealing in stolen property should be dismissed because he was a victim of entrapment. At the hearing on the motion, neither side presented testimony or documentary evidence; there was only legal argument and counsel's representations regarding the facts. The trial judge granted the motion to dismiss.
Brugman did not bring this motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4); therefore, the trial court was required to have an evidentiary basis to determine the issue of objective entrapment. See State v. Smith, 575 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). An attorney's unsworn statement does not establish a fact in absence of a stipulation. Leon Shaffer Golnick Advertising, Inc. v. Cedar, 423 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Thus, there was no competent evidence presented to the trial court.
Brugman argues that this point cannot be raised on appeal because the state did not object to counsel's representations of fact at the trial level. We disagree because all orders of this type must be supported by competent evidence. One case seems to support Brugman's position. In the case of Waste Management, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co., 571 So.2d 507 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), this court stated:
[W]e discuss FP & L's contention that Waste Management failed to present competent evidence in support of its claim that the documents in dispute are work product. FP & L asserts that Waste Management supported its claim of qualified privilege only through argument of counsel, not evidence. It is generally true that argument of counsel cannot be a trial court's basis for making a factual determination. Here, however, FP & L failed to object to the trial court to the factual representations made by counsel for Waste Management. In the absence of fundamental error, which is not present in this case,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kephart v. Hadi
...to prove any fact. Blimpie Capital Venture, Inc. v. Palms Plaza Partners Ltd., 636 So.2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); State v. Brugman, 588 So.2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). It is plain to see, then, that by charging the court with a duty to determine the existence of probable cause, the legislature......
-
State v. Adams
...DCA 1985); State v. Perez, 438 So.2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). See also State v. Petro, 592 So.2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); State v. Brugman, 588 So.2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). In the instant case, it was Hollecker who made the initial contact with appellee. As with one of the Hunter defendants,......
-
Kephart v. Regier, No. SC02-936 (FL 3/24/2005)
...to prove any fact. Blimpie Capital Venture, Inc. v. Palms Plaza Partners Ltd., 636 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); State v. Brugman, 588 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). It is plain to see, then, that by charging the court with a duty to determine the existence of probable cause, the legislatu......
-
Neal v. State
...argument interspersed with unsworn representations of fact cannot support a factual finding by a trial court); State v. Brugman, 588 So.2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (holding that, absent a stipulation, unsworn statements by attorney on motion to dismiss criminal charge do not establish facts, ......
-
Documentary evidence
...does not determine a fact in absence of the stipulation. J.A.R. v. State , 923 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) citing State v. Brugman , 588 So.2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). 3.6 DEPOSITIONS AT TRIAL 3.6.1 Use of Depositions at Trial Fla.Fam. L.R. Procedure 12.330 Pursuant to Fla. Fam. L.R. Proce......