State v. Bufford

• Decision Date: 10 March 1942
• Docket Number: 45873.
• Citation: 2 N.W.2d 634,231 Iowa 1000
• Parties: STATE v. BUFFORD.
• Court: Iowa Supreme Court

2 N.W.2d 634

231 Iowa 1000

STATE v. BUFFORD.

No. 45873.

Supreme Court of Iowa

March 10, 1942

Gertrude E. Rush, of Des Moines, for appellant.

John M. Rankin, Atty. Gen., Jens Grothe, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Francis J. Kuble, Co. Atty., and Fred Royal, Asst. Co. Atty both of Des Moines, for appellee.

HALE Justice.

Defendant, on August 26, 1941, was charged by county attorney's information with the offense of operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while in an intoxicated condition. On August 28, 1941, defendant appeared in person and by attorney, entered a plea of guilty to the charge made in the information, waived time, and asked that sentence be pronounced by the court; whereupon the court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment in the county jail of Polk county for a period of six months, and at the same time paroled the defendant to Mrs. Gertrude Rush, his attorney, during good behavior. On September 29, 1941, defendant's parole was revoked and he was ordered committed to the Polk county jail as provided in the original sentence, it appearing in the order made by the court that the defendant had violated the terms of his parole. From this order of the court the defendant appeals.

As we gather defendant claims, first, that the sentence is excessive, and second, error because, on the revocation of his parole, the defendant was not informed of the nature of his violation of the parole, and was not confronted with witnesses.

I. Defendant's appeal as to the alleged excessive sentence was taken too late, being more than sixty days after judgment. The court, however, was acting within its discretion. In our most recent similar case, State v. Pearce 231 Iowa 443, 1 N.W.2d 621, decided January 13, 1942, the record shows the same sentence was inflicted, and, as in previous cases, we declined to interfere.

II. Defendant was paroled by reason of the provisions of section 3800, Code of Iowa 1939, which authorizes parole under certain circumstances. The parole was revoked under section 3805, which reads as follows: "A suspension of a sentence by the court as herein provided may be revoked at any time, without notice, by the court or judge, and the defendant committed in obedience to such judgment." This statute gives authority to the court to determine without further proceedings whether or not the parole or suspended sentence which was granted as a matter of grace by the court should be continued, or the defendant required to comply with the judgment. The question raised by defendant has been determined by this court. See Pagano v Bechly, 211 Iowa 1294, 232 N.W. 798; Bennett v. Bradley, 216 Iowa 1267, 249 N.W. 651. In the Pagano case [211 Iowa 1294, 232 N.W. 799], the court says, in considering sections 3800 and 3805: "Plaintiff is in the anomalous position of asserting and claiming certain rights by virtue of the aforesaid section 3800, but asserting that he is not bound by section...