State v. Burnett
Decision Date | 11 June 1945 |
Docket Number | 39293 |
Citation | 188 S.W.2d 51,354 Mo. 45 |
Parties | State v. H. H. Burnett, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Mississippi Circuit Court; Hon. James C McDowell, Judge.
Reversed and remanded.
Claude F. Cooper and J. M. Haw for appellant; T J. Crowder of counsel.
(1) The evidence in this case is not legally sufficient to sustain a conviction of murder in the second degree. (2) The defendant requested several instructions on material issues which were by the court refused. It is the duty of the court to instruct the jury on all material issues and an offered instruction erroneous as to form is a sufficient request for a correct instruction on the issue. State v. Matthews, 20 Mo 55; State v. Jones, 61 Mo. 232; State v. McKenzie, 228 Mo. 385; State v. Jurnee, 309 Mo. 6. (3) The defendant would be justified in using sufficient force to repel an assault by the deceased, either upon his wife or son or himself, and, if necessary, had a right to shoot and kill the deceased. Sec. 4379, R.S. 1939; State v. Custer, 336 Mo. 514, 80 S.W.2d 176; State v. Dollarhide, 337 Mo. 962, 87 S.W.2d 156. (4) The deceased, although a peace officer, had no lawful authority to arrest Gene Burnett and in attempting to do so under the circumstances he became a trespasser. Under these circumstances, the defendant had a lawful right to eject the deceased and if necessary to use force commensurate with the apparent necessity. Greaves v. K.C. Junior Orpheum Co., 229 Mo.App. 663, 80 S.W.2d 228; Wehmeyer v. Mulvihill, 150 Mo.App. 197, 130 S.W. 681; State ex rel. Patterson v. Collins, 172 S.W.2d 284.
J. E. Taylor, Attorney General, and A. V. Owsley, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
(1) There is substantial evidence to sustain a conviction. Sec. 4377, R.S. 1939; State v. Hogan, 177 S.W.2d 465; State v. Page, 130 S.W.2d 520; State v. Majors, 329 Mo. 148, 44 S.W.2d 163. (2) The court did not err in refusing defendant's instructions; the converse of the State's main instruction was sufficiently submitted. State v. Messino, 325 Mo. 743, 30 S.W.2d 750; State v. Dougherty, 287 Mo. 82, 228 S.W. 786. (3) The jury found that the appellant had used too much force in repelling or evicting the deceased. State v. Reed, 154 Mo. 122, 55 S.W. 278; State v. Partlow, 90 Mo. 608, 4 S.W. 14. (4) The appellant used too much force commensurate with the apparent necessity. State v. Holcomb, 86 Mo. 371; Roberts v. State, 14 Mo. 138, 55 Am. Dec. 97; State v. Johnson, 76 Mo. 121.
An information was filed in the circuit court of New Madrid County, Missouri, charging the appellant, his wife, Susie Burnett, and his son, Gene Burnett, with murder in the first degree for having killed Hughey Kitchen, the town marshal of Parma, Missouri. An application for a change of venue was sustained, and the cause was sent to the circuit court of Mississippi County. A severance was granted and on appellant's trial, he was found guilty of murder in the second degree. His punishment was assessed at imprisonment in the State Penitentiary for a term of fourteen years.
Appellant's first contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury. This calls for a review of the evidence. In appellant's testimony, he admitted the shooting and killing of the deceased, but pleaded justification in so doing.
The evidence most favorable to the State is as follows: The deceased was killed in the appellant's restaurant in the town of Parma, Missouri, late in the afternoon of Saturday, April 17, 1943. On the day of the killing, the deceased, who was the town marshal, was leaving the pool hall next door to appellant's place of business. Gene Burnett and his mother, Susie Burnett, were sitting in the back room of the restaurant and the windows were open. Some remark was made by Gene Burnett loud enough for deceased to hear. The deceased asked Gene if he were talking to him. Gene said he was not, but was talking to his mother. Gene said something else to his mother, whereupon the deceased turned and said, "You are talking to me too." Gene said, Deceased entered the room and undertook to arrest Gene. Gene told him that he had done nothing, and would not go. Deceased then said, "I'll go to the City Hall and come back, and I'll take you dead or alive."
Otho Gee, a witness for the State, testified as follows: (Italics ours.)
The witness and deceased then went to the kitchen, which was in the rear of the restaurant. In the kitchen were Mrs. Evans, the cook, Mrs. Susie Burnett, and Gene Burnett. The appellant followed the deceased and witness into the kitchen. Mr. Gee further testified:
After Gene Burnett grabbed the deceased, and while they were scuffling, the appellant shot deceased. Mr. Gee then testified:
On cross-examination, this witness testified that deceased never told him or Gene Burnett what he was arresting Gene for; that he did not state that he had a warrant for his arrest; and that all deceased told Gene was, "Come and go with us, you are under arrest."
When deceased drew the gun on Gene, they were three or four feet apart. The witness, also, testified that when they first went into the kitchen, deceased "kind of pushed" Mrs. Susie Burnett back.
There was, also, testimony to the effect that just prior to the time the first shot was fired, deceased had a blackjack in his right hand.
Other witnesses testified they came into the restaurant about the time the first shot was fired and they observed no threatening or abusive conduct by deceased toward appellant, his wife, or son.
W. M. Tucker testified that prior to the date deceased was killed, he was in appellant's restaurant when deceased passed by and said, "There goes Hughie Kitchens." The appellant replied, "Yes, sir, that's a dirty son-of-a-bitch; if he ever sets foot inside my building to get people like he did in other people's, he'll go out of here a dead man." Several other witnesses testified to similar statements made by appellant.
Appellant's and his witnesses' testimony showed that appellant killed deceased in self-defense and in resisting the arrest of his son, Gene, and that appellant was barely acquainted with deceased and had no ill feeling toward him.
There was no evidence in this record that shows why deceased was attempting to arrest Gene Burnett or that he had ever committed any crime or that he was ever suspected of committing a crime.
Appellant contends that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Humphrey
... ... Worten, 263 S.W. 124 ... J. E ... Taylor, Attorney General, Arthur M. O'Keefe, Assistant ... Attorney General, for respondent ... (1) The ... court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to ... suppress evidence. State v. Burnett, 354 Mo. 45, 188 ... S.W.2d 51; Hanser v. Bieber, 197 S.W. 68, 271 Mo ... 236; Wehmeyer v. Mulvihill, 150 Mo.App. 197, 130 ... S.W. 681; State v. Raines, 339 Mo. 884, 98 S.W.2d ... 580; State v. Pomeroy, 130 Mo. 489, 32 S.W. 1002 ... (2) The evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction ... ...
-
State v. Burnett
...1168, 126 S.W.2d 245. (4) There was sufficient evidence to support the verdict of manslaughter. State v. Nolan, 192 S.W.2d 1016; State v. Burnett, 188 S.W.2d 51. (5) The court did not err in refusing to defendant's plea in abatement, filed in the Circuit Court of New Madrid County, Missouri......
-
State v. Nolan
...of applying the policy provisions to the facts of that case is not controlling here. The issue and the facts differ. In State v. Burnett, 354 Mo. 45, 188 S.W. 2d 51, 53[1], there was no evidence that defendant had committed any or was suspected of any felony. State v. Jordan, 306 Mo. 3, 23(......
-
State v. Browers
... ... jeep, itself, and the attitude and conduct of the appellant ... and his brother Irvin. If it was the misdemeanor he needed to ... have a warrant, or the offense must have been committed in ... his view, as was the undisputed fact. State v ... Burnett, 354 Mo. 45, 48(1), 188 S.W.2d 51, 53(1); ... State v. McBride, 327 Mo. 184, 188(5), 37 S.W. 423, ... Assuming ... the arrest here was for the misdemeanor of breach of the ... peace -- which concededly was committed in the marshal's ... presence -- is the broad holding of the ... ...