State v. Corbett
| Citation | 376 N.C. 799,855 S.E.2d 228 |
| Decision Date | 12 March 2021 |
| Docket Number | No. 73A20,73A20 |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Molly Martens CORBETT and Thomas Michael Martens |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Jonathan P. Babb and L. Michael Dodd, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for the State-appellant.
Tharrington Smith, L.L.P., Raleigh, by Douglas E. Kingsbery, for defendant-appellee Molly Martens Corbett.
Dudley A. Witt, David B. Freedman, and Jones P. Byrd, Jr., Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellee Thomas Michael Martens.
¶ 1 In the early morning hours of 2 August 2015, a Davidson County 911 operator received a call regarding an incident at 160 Panther Creek Court. The caller, Thomas Martens (Tom), reported that his son-in-law, Jason Corbett (Jason), "got in a fight" with his daughter, Molly Martens Corbett (Molly), and that he had found Jason Tom told the dispatcher that he had hit Jason in the head with a baseball bat. Jason was The 911 operator instructed Tom and Molly to perform CPR while emergency medical technicians (EMTs) were dispatched to the home. When they got there, the EMTs found Molly performing chest compressions on Jason in the master bedroom, but Jason did not survive. Law enforcement officers who arrived shortly thereafter found Molly "very obviously in shock." She told the officers she had been choked.
¶ 2 Subsequently, Molly and Tom were charged with and ultimately convicted of second-degree murder for the homicide of Jason. From their first call to 911 through the trial, Molly and Tom did not deny that they had killed Jason. Instead, they maintained that they had lawfully used deadly force to defend themselves while under the reasonable apprehension that they were facing an imminent threat of deadly harm during a violent altercation initiated by Jason. On appeal, a divided panel of the Court of Appeals vacated Molly's and Tom's convictions and ordered a new trial. State v. Corbett , 269 N.C. App. 509, 512, 839 S.E.2d 361, writ allowed , 373 N.C. 580, 838 S.E.2d 461, and writ dismissed , 375 N.C. 276, 845 S.E.2d 793 (2020).
¶ 3 The jury in this case did not have to determine who killed Jason. Instead, they had to decide to believe either Tom's testimony that Jason was threatening to kill Molly and was in the process of choking her to death, or to believe the State's theory that Tom and Molly were the aggressors in the altercation and killed Jason without justification. After careful review, we agree with the majority below that the trial court committed prejudicial error in excluding evidence that went to the heart of defendants’ self-defense claims. The trial court's errors in excluding certain evidence deprived defendants of the full opportunity to put the jury in their position at the time they used deadly force. In turn, this deprived the jury of evidence necessary to fairly determine whether Tom and Molly used deadly force at a moment when they were actually and reasonably fearful for their lives. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for a new trial.
¶ 4 Jason was a citizen and resident of the Republic of Ireland. He had two children, Jack and Sarah, with his first wife, Margaret. Margaret died unexpectedly in 2006, from what the Irish authorities determined to be complications of an asthma attack, just eleven weeks after giving birth to Sarah. In late 2007 or early 2008, Jason hired Molly to work as an au pair in his home in Ireland. The two later began a romantic relationship. In 2011, Jason, Molly, Jack, and Sarah moved to Davidson County, North Carolina, after Jason transferred to an office his employer had recently opened in the United States. Jason and Molly married that same year.
¶ 5 At around 8:30 p.m. on 1 August 2015, Molly's parents, Tom and Sharon Martens, who lived in Tennessee, arrived at the Corbett's home in Davidson County for a visit. Tom—a retired FBI agent and former attorney—brought an aluminum baseball bat and a tennis racket as gifts for Jack. According to Tom's testimony, Jason had been drinking beer with his neighbor but was pleasant and social during the evening. Jack, who had been at a party at a friend's house, returned home around 11:00 p.m. Because it was late, Tom decided to wait until the following morning to give Jack the bat and tennis racket. Tom and Sharon went to sleep in the guest bedroom, located on the floor below the master bedroom where Jason and Molly typically slept.
¶ 6 Tom testified that in the middle of the night, he was awakened by the sound of thumping on the floor above him, followed by "a scream and loud voices." He thought "it sounded bad ... like a matter of urgency." He grabbed the baseball bat and ran upstairs toward the source of the noises, which he determined was the master bedroom. Inside the bedroom, Tom encountered Jason and Molly facing each other. Jason's hands were around Molly's neck. Tom testified that he told Jason to let Molly go, to which Jason replied, "I'm going to kill her." Tom again asked Jason to let Molly go, to which Jason again replied, "I'm going to kill her." Jason then "reversed himself so that he had [Molly's] neck in the crook of his right arm" and started dragging Molly toward the bathroom.
¶ 7 According to Tom, he feared that if Jason reached the bathroom with Molly, Jason would close the door and kill her. In an effort to impede Jason, Tom swung the baseball bat at "the back of the two of them glued together." However, the initial blow apparently had no effect on Jason. From Tom's perspective, it only "further enraged" him. Tom continued striking Jason "to distract him because he now had Molly in a very tight chokehold" and "she was no longer wiggling." Tom was unable to prevent Jason from reaching the bathroom. However, after following Jason into the bathroom, Tom struck Jason in the head with the bat. In response, Jason charged out of the bathroom and back toward the master bedroom, pushing Molly in front of him. Tom continued to swing the baseball bat at Jason to try to separate him from Molly. Eventually, Molly slipped out of Jason's arms, but Jason was able to wrestle the bat out of Tom's grasp. Tom, who had lost his glasses and was pushed to the floor in the struggle, testified that he heard Molly yell "[d]on't hurt my dad," although this portion of his testimony was stricken upon the State's objection. In a written statement admitted into evidence at the trial, Molly maintained that at some point after Jason took the bat from Tom, she "tried to hit [Jason] with a brick (garden décor) I had on my nightstand."
¶ 8 When Tom regained his footing, he saw Molly trapped between Jason and the bedroom wall. He claimed that he was physically weakened and in fear for both his daughter's life and his own. Jason was twenty-six years younger than Tom and outweighed him by more than 100 pounds. Tom testified the following:
Tom gathered his thoughts and told Molly "we need to call 911." Both Tom and Molly were themselves "in pretty bad shape," but Molly eventually brought Tom a phone, and they called 911.
¶ 9 The first EMT to arrive at the scene found Jason on the floor of the master bedroom. He noticed a baseball bat and a brick paver near Jason's body. There was "blood all over the floor and the walls." The EMT could not locate a pulse. When the EMT tried to lift Jason's chin for intubation, the fingers on the EMT's left hand "went inside [Jason's] skull," and he realized that "there was severe heavy trauma to the back of the head." Other EMTs who attempted to revive Jason testified that his body "felt cool" when they arrived and that they observed dried blood. The forensic pathologist who conducted Jason's autopsy concluded that he had died from "multiple blunt force injuries" which included "ten different areas of impact on the head, at least two of which had features suggesting repeated blows indicating a minimum of 12 different blows to the head." According to the forensic pathologist, the "degree of skull fractures ... are the types of injuries that we may see in falls from great heights or in car crashes under other circumstances."
¶ 10 Corporal Clayton Stewart...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Reid
...recanted the statement, and (4) the practical availability of the declarant at trial for meaningful cross-examination.’ " State v. Corbett , 376 N.C. 799, 2021-NCSC-18, ¶ 41, 855 S.E.2d 228 (quoting State v. Triplett , 316 N.C. 1, 10–11, 340 S.E.2d 736 (1986) ). "A trial court's determinati......
-
State v. Thomas
... ... 27 First, Defendant alleges the expert failed to follow his own laboratory's protocols "regarding the time between the alleged discharge of a firearm and the swabbing of persons/ objects for testing." In making that argument, Defendant relies heavily on State v. Corbett , 269 N.C. App. 509, 839 S.E.2d 361 (2020), aff'd 376 N.C. 799, 2021-NCSC-18, 855 S.E.2d 228 4 , where this Court agreed with the defendant's argument that an expert was unreliable if he failed to follow his own admitted reliability standards. Defendant here cites to the expert's testimony that ... ...
-
State v. Reid
... ... (2) the declarant's motivation to speak the truth or ... otherwise, (3) whether the declarant has ever recanted the ... statement, and (4) the practical availability of the ... declarant at trial for meaningful ... cross-examination.'" State v. Corbett , 376 ... N.C. 799, 2021-NCSC-18, ¶ 41 (quoting State v ... Triplett , 316 N.C. 1, 10-11 (1986)). "A trial ... court's determination as to the admissibility of hearsay ... statements pursuant to Rule 803(24) is reviewed for abuse of ... discretion." Id. ¶ 40 ... ¶ ... 45 In ... ...
-
State v. Graham
...to the admission of evidence involving that line of questioning. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1446(d)(10) (2019) ; see also State v. Corbett , 376 N.C. 799, 2021-NCSC-18, ¶ 55, 855 S.E.2d 228 ("Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-1446(d)(10), notwithstanding a party's failure to object to the admission of ......