State v. Fie, 389A86
| Decision Date | 03 September 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 389A86,389A86 |
| Citation | 359 S.E.2d 774,320 N.C. 626 |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Floyd Rufus FIE and Steve Harverson. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Joan H. Byers, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.
John E. Shackelford, Asheville, for defendant Floyd Rufus Fie.
Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Appellate Defender by Geoffrey C. Mangum, Asst. Appellate Defender, Raleigh, for defendant Steven Harverson.
This case brings to the Court the question of the standard to be applied when a defendant makes a motion that a judge be recused. Judge Martin in his concurring opinion in the Court of Appeals said that in his view Judge Martin relied, on State v. Duvall, 50 N.C.App. 684, 275 S.E.2d 842, rev'd on other grounds, 304 N.C. 557, 284 S.E.2d 495 (1981) and Love v. Pressley, 34 N.C.App. 503, 239 S.E.2d 574 (1977), disc. rev. denied, 294 N.C. 441, 241 S.E.2d 843 (1978). These cases support Judge Martin's position. Nevertheless, we also agree with Judge Wells that a party has a right to be tried before a judge whose impartiality cannot reasonably be questioned. Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3(C)1 (1973).
N.C.G.S. § 15A-1223 provides in pertinent part:
* * *
(b) A judge, on motion of the State or the defendant, must disqualify himself from presiding over a criminal trial or other criminal proceeding if he is:
(1) Prejudiced against the moving party or in favor of the adverse party; or
* * *
(4) For any other reason unable to perform the duties required of him in an impartial manner.
It appears that under this section Judge Burroughs should not have been disqualified. This does not settle the matter. A judge may be disqualified for reasons other than those stated in the statute. We said in Ponder v. Davis, 233 N.C. 699, 706, 65 S.E.2d 356, 360 (1951):
It is not enough for a judge to be just in his judgment; he should strive to make the parties and the community feel that he is just; he owes this to himself, to the law and to the position he holds. ... "The purity and integrity of the judicial process ought to be protected against any taint of suspicion to the end that the public and litigants may have the highest confidence in the integrity and fairness of the courts." (Quoting, Haslam v. Morrison, 113 Utah 14, 190 P.2d 520.)
N.C.G.S. § 5A-15 which governs plenary proceedings for criminal contempt provides that if "the criminal contempt is based upon acts before a judge which so involve him that his objectivity may reasonably be questioned, the order must be returned before a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Scott
...Conduct control the disqualification of a judge presiding over a criminal trial when partiality is claimed. State v. Fie, 320 N.C. 626, 627, 359 S.E.2d 774, 775 (1987). N.C.G.S. § 15A-1223 provides, in pertinent (b) A judge, on motion of the State or the defendant, must disqualify himself f......
-
Franco v. Liposcience, Inc.
...that the judge has such a personal bias, prejudice or interest that he would be unable to rule impartially." See State v. Fie, 320 N.C. 626, 627, 359 S.E.2d 774, 775 (1987) (citations Franco, Jr. argues that Judge Baddour's father's affiliation with Liposcience CEO Dr. Sanders created groun......
-
State v. Richardson
...the Code of Judicial Conduct, defendant had the burden "to demonstrate objectively that grounds for disqualification actually exist," Fie, 320 N.C. at 627 (emphasis added) (quoting Fie, 80 N.C.App. at (Martin, J., concurring)), and that such grounds exist through the production of "substant......
-
Guzman v. Gore
...that it is the right of a party "to be tried before a judge whose impartiality cannot reasonably be questioned." State v. Fie, 320 N.C. 626, 627, 359 S.E.2d 774, 775 (1987). However, this Court has noted that [t]he United States Supreme Court has held 'that there is no per se violation of d......