State v. Firemen's Fund Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 30 June 1899 |
Citation | 152 Mo. 1,52 S.W. 595 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. CROW, Atty. Gen., v. FIREMEN'S FUND INS. CO. et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
3. After Acts 1895, p. 237, prohibiting pools or trusts among insurance companies to fix rates for insurance, went into effect, companies doing business in St. Joseph subscribed for the rate books issued by one who had fixed rates for the underwriters' association. The agents of the companies joined a "social club," and hired an employé of the one who issued the rate books to act as secretary. Each policy written by the agent was put in an unsealed envelope, addressed to his company, and was then turned over to the secretary of the club, who compared it with the rate book, and, if the premium charged did not correspond therewith, he called upon the agent for an explanation. The members of the club had an oral agreement to abide by the rates fixed on penalty of a fine, and violators of the agreement were tried by the club. Held, that the club was a pool or trust, within Acts 1895, p. 237, § 1, providing that any corporation or individual who shall enter into "any pool, trust, agreement, combination, confederation, or understanding with any other corporation, partnership, or individual" to fix the price or premium to be paid for insuring property against loss by fire, or to maintain the price when so fixed, shall be deemed guilty of a conspiracy, and shall forfeit their rights to do business in the state.
4. Act April 2, 1891 (Acts 1891, p. 186), entitled "An act providing for the punishment of pools, trusts and conspiracies to control prices, and as to evidence and prosecution in such cases," and providing, as amended by Acts 1895, p. 237, that any corporation or individuals who shall enter into a pool or trust to regulate the price of any article of manufacture, or commodity, "or the price or premium to be paid for insuring property against loss by fire, lightning, or storm" shall be guilty of conspiracy, does not violate Const. art. 4, § 28, providing that no bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title.
5. Acts 1895, p. 237, providing that any corporation or individual who shall enter into any pool or trust with any other corporation or individual to fix the price or premium to be paid for insuring property, or to maintain the price when so fixed, shall be deemed guilty of conspiracy, and shall forfeit their rights to do business in the state, does not deprive such person of liberty or property without due process of law.
6. Such act does not deprive insurance companies which have complied with the laws of the state as they existed before its enactment of any vested right.
7. Where, in proceedings against insurance companies under Acts 1895, p. 237, providing for the forfeiture of the franchises of insurance companies who combine together to regulate and maintain insurance rates, the question whether the act of the agent is the act of the company is treated as one of fact, and no presumption is invoked, the fact that section 6 of such act, making the act of the agent prima facie proof of the act of the company as to foreign companies only, is invalid, cannot avail defendants.
8. Where, in proceedings against insurance companies under Acts 1895, p. 237, providing for the forfeiture of the franchises of insurance companies who combine together to regulate and maintain insurance rates, no attorney's fees are allowed, the fact that sections 9 and 10 of such act, allowing attorney's fees, is invalid, cannot avail defendants.
In banc. Original proceeding by the state by quo warranto on the information of Edward C. Crow, attorney general, against the Firemen's Fund Insurance Company and others. Judgment against respondents.
This is an original proceeding by quo warranto to oust 73 fire insurance companies of their corporate rights, privileges, and franchises under the laws of Missouri on account of a violation by them of the laws of this state relating to "pools, trusts, and conspiracies, unlawful combinations." The defendant companies are organized under the laws of other states or foreign countries, and are doing an insurance business in Missouri by reason of and compliance with the comity laws of this state. The petition, after stating the necessary facts as to the character and organization of the defendants and their compliance with the laws of Missouri in respect to foreign insurance companies doing business in this state, is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey Club
...it, or it may be simple fine if that is deemed sufficient. 14a C.J. p. 1140; 22 R.C.L. secs 45-47; State v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 152 Mo. 1, 52 S.W. 595, 45 L.R.A. 363; State v. Armour Packing Co., 173 Mo. 356, 73 S.W. 645, 61 L.R.A. 464, 96 Am. St. Rep. 515; Weston v. Lane, 40 Kan. 479,......
-
Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey Club
... ... the state racing commission, upon the assumed authority of ... statutes that were ... 34, 27 S.Ct. 419, 51 L.Ed. 696, 10 Ann.Cas. 525; New York ... Life Ins. Co. v. Deer Lodge County, 231 U.S. 495, 34 ... S.Ct. 167, 58 L.Ed. 332 ... In Gordon v. Winchester Building & ... Accumulating Fund Ass'n, 12 Bush, 110, 23 Am.Rep ... 713, and Kentucky Trust Co. v ... ...
-
Wyoming Construction and Development Co. v. Buffalo Lumber Co.
... ... Co. v. Gordon, 113 Ia. 481, 85 N.W. 816; American ... Ins. Co. v. Cutler, 36 Mich. 261; Lehigh V. C. Co ... v. Gilmore, 93 ... in the state within the meaning of the statute. ( Missouri ... C. & M. Co. v. Ladd, ... Pence, 40 Minn. 122, 41 N.W. 651; State v ... Firemen's Fund Ins. Co., 152 Mo. 1, 52 S.W. 595; ... Robeman v. Gaiser, 53 Neb. 424, ... ...
-
State v. Arkansas Lumber Co.
...period, if the original conspiracy be barred, we may yet find this by circumstantial evidence. State ex rel. v. Firemen's Fund Ins. Co., 152 Mo. 1, 52 S. W. 595, 45 L. R. A. 363. But we are not under the facts here compelled to resort to circumstantial evidence. We have the admissions of th......