State v. Gary, 65P99.
Decision Date | 08 April 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 65P99.,65P99. |
Citation | 350 N.C. 312,535 S.E.2d 35 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Larry GARY, Jr. |
Ames C. Chamberlin, Assistant Public Defender, for Gary.
Joyce C. Rutledge, Assistant Attorney General, Horace M. Kimel, Jr., District Attorney, for State.
Prior report: 132 N.C.App. 40, 510 S.E.2d 387.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of April 1999."
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Gillespie
...by the trial court, and filed with the clerk of court." State v. Gary, 132 N.C.App. 40, 42, 510 S.E.2d 387, 388, cert. denied, 350 N.C. 312, 535 S.E.2d 35 (1999); see also S. Furniture Hardware, Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 136 N.C.App. 695, 702, 526 S.E.2d 197, 201 (2000) ("When an ......
-
Southern Furn. Hardware v. BRANCH BANKING
... ... Court of Appeals of North Carolina ... March 7, 2000. 526 S.E.2d 198 C. Gary Triggs, P.A., by C. Gary Triggs, Morganton, for plaintiff-appellants/appellees ... 600, 602-03, 481 S.E.2d 347, 348-49 (1997) (internal citations omitted); see also State v. Hayes, 350 N.C. 79, 511 S.E.2d 302 (1999); Heatherly v. Industrial Health Council, 130 N.C.App ... ...
-
State v. Coleman
...an order occurs when it is reduced to writing, signed by the trial court, and filed with the clerk of court."), cert. denied, 350 N.C. 312, 535 S.E.2d 35 (1999). On 8 January 2004, defendant filed another motion for appropriate relief, which was granted on 22 January 2004, and on 24 March 2......
-
In re K.S.
...quotation marks and citations omitted); see also State v. Gary, 132 N.C.App. 40, 42, 510 S.E.2d 387, 388, cert. denied, 350 N.C. 312, 535 S.E.2d 35 (1999). Thus, the trial court's oral ruling denying visitation was not final, and the court had the authority to alter its ruling in its writte......