State v. Glenn
Decision Date | 21 February 1939 |
Citation | 4 A.2d 366,39 Del. 584 |
Court | Delaware Superior Court |
Parties | THE STATE OF DELAWARE, upon the relation of Percy Warren Green, Attorney-General, v. GEORGE J. GLENN |
Superior Court for New Castle County, No. 146, January Term 1938.
Motion to discharge the rule.
This proceeding was brought to determine the question whether George J. Glenn, the defendant, or Thomas E. Peeney, in whose interest the relator sued, was entitled to the position of secretary of the Department of Elections for the City of Wilmington.
A rule to show cause why leave should not be granted to file the information was issued and served upon the defendant.
The defendant moved to discharge the rule on the following grounds:--
1. That this Court is without jurisdiction to grant leave to file the information in that the position of Secretary of the Department of Elections for the City of Wilmington is not a public office.
2. That said information does not state facts to constitute a cause of action.
The only provisions of the Act relating to the Department of Elections (Chapter 56 of the Revised Code of 1935) which have any pertinency to this case are as follows:
The rule is discharged.
Percy Warren Green, Attorney-General, in propria persona.
Josiah Marvel and William Marvel for defendant.
This is a motion by the defendant to discharge the rule to show cause why leave should not be granted to file the information because as he contends this Court has no jurisdiction in that the secretary of the Department of Elections for the City of Wilmington is not a public officer.
This contention is denied by the relator.
Brooks v. State, 26 Del. 1, 3 Boyce 1, 79 A. 790, 796, 51 L. R. A. (N.S.) 1126, Ann. Cas. 1915A, 1133.
In considering the distinction between a public office and a mere employment it has been said:
State v. Corley, 6 W. W. Harr. (36 Del.) 135, 172 A. 415, 419.
It has been stated that "The oath, the salary or fees are mere incidents and constitute no part of the office." Throop Public Officers, Section 3. They may, however, be considered in doubtful cases in determining whether a position is an office or a mere employment. See annotation, 53 A. L. R. 602; 93 A. L. R. 337.
The phrases "public offices" and "public officers" have been defined in many ways, but in substance the various definitions of the respective phrases do not vary.
By Section 1 of Meecham on Public Officers, they are defined as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Hord
...P.2d 406; Brown v. Boyd, 33 Cal.App.2d 416, 91 P.2d 926; Temple v. City of New Britain, 127 Conn. 170, 15 A.2d 318; State ex rel. Green v. Glenn, 39 Del. 584, 4 A.2d 366; Curry v. Hammond, 154 Fla. 63, 16 So.2d 523; Buchholtz v. Hill, 178 Md. 280, 13 A.2d 348; Olson v. City of Highland Park......
-
State v. Johnston
...& Light Co., 120 Wis.2d 508, 516, 355 N.W.2d 557, 562 (Ct.App.1984).6 Other jurisdictions are in accord. See State ex rel. Green v. Glenn, 39 Del. 584, 4 A.2d 366, 367 (1939); Fair v. Citizens' State Bank, 70 Kan. 612, 79 P. 144, 145 (1905); Giacopelli v. Clymer, 521 S.W.2d 196, 197 (Mo.Ct.......
-
IN RE REQUEST OF GOV. FOR ADVISORY OPIN.
...sovereignty of the state, to be exercised in the interest of the public, and required by law,'...."). 25. Compare State ex rel. Green v. Glenn, Del.Super., 4 A.2d 366 (1939), where the Court found that the Secretary to the Department of Elections for the City of Wilmington was a public empl......
-
Opinion of the Justices, 266
...of an oath requirement, however, does not negate "public officer" status which is otherwise clearly conferred. State ex rel. Green v. Glenn, 39 Del. 584, 4 A.2d 366, 367 (1939). The oath is considered a "mere incident" of the Affirmative Answer Each member of a board or commission appointed......