State v. Haines
| Decision Date | 11 May 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-1363,88-1363 |
| Citation | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1168,543 So.2d 1278 |
| Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1168 STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Dudley S. HAINES, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Michael J. Snure, of Muller, Kirkconnell, Lindsey & Snure, P.A., Winter Park, for appellee.
The state appeals from the trial court's order which suppressed evidence located within Haines' home. Haines was charged with possession of a controlled substance, cannabis, in excess of twenty grams. 1 Haines argued below that the police lacked sufficient probable cause to search for a possible burglar in his residence where the cannabis was discovered; and that they exceeded the bounds of a reasonable search when a police officer peeked into a closet and found marijuana plants growing in a large terrarium. We reverse.
The record of the suppression hearing established that Haines' well-meaning neighbor, Moore, called the police to investigate a possible burglary of Haines' residence. Moore occupied the other half of Haines' duplex. He told the three police officers when they arrived that the owner or people living in Haines' duplex were out-of-town on a fishing trip. He was concerned because he noted that the front door of Haines' residence was standing open approximately four to five inches. It was 8:00 p.m.; and no lights were on inside.
At that point, the police officers opened the door and announced they were members of the police department. Receiving no response, they searched the various rooms of the residence for an intruder. While making the search, they pulled aside a curtain covering the entrance to a closet in the hallway, and discovered the terrarium. It was in plain view, and the closet was sufficiently large to have provided a hiding place for a possible burglar.
We think the police officers were justified under these circumstances in conducting a search of the residence for possible intruders. State v. Mann, 440 So.2d 406 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Guin v. City of Riviera Beach, 388 So.2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); State v. Garcia, 374 So.2d 601 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Sufficient exigent circumstances existed to excuse the obtaining of a search warrant. See Johnson v. State, 386 So.2d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The search conducted here was not for cannabis, but for a possible burglar. The fact that...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Yee
...factual situations have upheld warrantless police searches. Davis v. State, 834 So.2d 322 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ; State v. Haines, 543 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) ; State v. Mann, 440 So.2d 406 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).In Davis, a concerned citizen reported to the police that the front door of ......
-
Montanez v. Carvajal
...entry and search to be justified by exigent circumstances based on the indications of forced entry. Id. at 328.In State v. Haines , 543 So.2d 1278 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989), police also received a call from a concerned citizen reporting a possible burglary at his neighbor's house, who the ......
-
Aguilar v. State, Case No. 2D17-4086
...322, 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (first citing State v. Craycraft, 704 So.2d 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) ; and then citing State v. Haines, 543 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) ). Law enforcement had an objectively reasonable basis to support their sweep of Mr. Aguilar's house in light of the exigent......
-
Love v. State
...caretaking functions, police officers may enter premises where there exists direct evidence of a home invasion); State v. Haines, 543 So.2d 1278 (Fla.App. 1989) (motion to suppress evidence of marijuana found growing in closet denied where police conducted a warrantless sweep of the residen......