State v. Hamby

• Decision Date: 31 August 1972
• Docket Number: No. 129,129
• Court: North Carolina Supreme Court
• Parties: STATE of North Carolina v. Ray HAMBY. STATE of North Carolina v. Craig Barry CHANDLER.

Page 66

191 S.E.2d 66

281 N.C. 743

STATE of North Carolina v. Ray HAMBY.

STATE of North Carolina v. Craig Barry CHANDLER.

No. 129.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 31, 1972.

On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

SHARP, Justice:

At the 8 September 1969 Session of the Superior Court of Lincoln County defendants were tried and convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree, and each was sentenced to death. Upon defendants' appeal this Court found no error in the verdicts and judgments of the Superior Court. State v. Hamby and State v. Chandler, 276 N.C. 674, 174 S.E.2d 385 (1970). Defendants then filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, 408 U.S. 937, 92 S.Ct. 2862, 33 L.Ed.2d 754. On 29 July 1972 this Court received from the Supreme Court of the United States the following mandate:

"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SS:

"THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

"To the Honorable the Judges of the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina,

"GREETINGS:

"WHEREAS, lately in the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina, --- there came before you a cause between the State of North Carolina and Ray Hamby and Craig Barry Chandler, No 4, Spring Term, 1970, wherein the judgment of the said Supreme Court was duly entered on the twelfth day of June A.D. 1970, as appears by an inspection of the petition for writ of certiorari to the said Supreme Court and the response thereto.

"AND WHEREAS, in the 1971 Term, the said cause having been submitted to the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES on the said petition for writ of certiorari and response thereto, and the Court having granted the said petition:

"ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it was ordered and adjudged on June 29, 1972, by this Court that the judgment of the Supreme Court of North Carolina in this cause be vacated insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death penalty imposed, and that this cause be remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina for further proceedings. See Stewart v. Massachusetts, 408 U.S. 845, [92 S.Ct. 2845, 33 L.Ed.2d 744] (1972).

"NOW, THEREFORE, THE CAUSE IS REMANDED to you in order that such proceedings may be had in the said cause, in conformity with the judgment of this Court above stated, as accord with right and justice, and the Constitution and laws of the United States, the said writ of certiorari notwithstanding.

"Witness the Honorable WARREN E. BURGER, Chief Justice of the United States, the twenty-sixth --- day of July in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and seventy-two.

MICHAEL RODAK, JR.

Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States

No. 70-5006

Ray Hamby and Craig Barry Chandler

v.

North Carolina"

The opinion in Stewart v. Massachusetts, referred to in the foregoing mandate, is as follows:

"Per Curiam. The appellant in this case was sentenced to death. The imposition and carrying out of that death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972). The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is therefore vacated insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death penalty imposed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings."

Pursuant to the foregoing mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the death penalty imposed upon defendants, this cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Lincoln County with...