State v. Hastings, 80-151
| Decision Date | 18 June 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 80-151,80-151 |
| Parties | The STATE of New Hampshire v. Robert J. HASTINGS. |
| Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Gregory H. Smith, Acting Atty. Gen. (Deborah J. Cooper, Asst. Atty. Gen., orally), for the State.
Spaloss & Rosson, Nashua (Henry F. Spaloss, Nashua, orally), for defendant.
This case involves the timeliness of an indictment. On December 3, 1979, the defendant was arrested for the felony of receiving stolen property. Two weeks later, the defendant was bound over after the Nashua District Court found probable cause. The complaint was then transmitted to the superior court two days later.
The Hillsborough County Grand Jury sat on January 2 and February 12, 1980, but the county attorney presented no indictment for the grand jury's consideration. On February 15, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of speedy trial, which was heard on March 5. The State represented that it did not have the police file even though three months had elapsed since arrest and, further, that there was a delay because of the need to process some juveniles through court. At that hearing the Trial Court (Goode, J.) suggested that by waiving indictment the defendant could obtain a speedy trial. The court then denied the motion but gave no reasons.
On April 1, the grand jury sat again, and again the State presented no indictment. On May 15, the grand jury finally indicted the defendant for receiving stolen property. This occurred after the interlocutory appeal to this court had been filed.
First, we note that the defendant's right to waive grand jury indictment is his exclusive right and should not be recommended or insisted upon by either the court or the prosecutor. This court approves of no such recommendations.
Before a defendant can be tried for a felony, he must either be indicted or waive indictment. The State and Federal Constitutions guarantee a speedy trial but not a speedy indictment. N.H. Const. pt. I, art. 14; U.S. Const. amends. V, XIV; United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977). Of course, this defendant has been arrested, and the time clock for speedy trial runs from arrest rather than the later indictment. Dillingham v. United States, 423 U.S. 64, 96 S.Ct. 303, 46 L.Ed.2d 205 (1975); State v. Collins, 115 N.H. 499, 502, 345 A.2d 162, 165 (1975). In this case, the delay has not yet violated the right to speedy trial. See State v. Fraser, 120 N.H. ---, 411 A.2d 1125 (1980); State v. Hudson, 119 N.H. ---, 409 A.2d 1349 (1979).
We remind the State that it has a constitutional duty to make a diligent, good faith effort to bring a defendant to trial. State v. Hudson, supra at ---, 409 A.2d at 1351....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Humphrey v. Cunningham, 89-403
...the petitioner to trial. The State has a constitutional duty to make such an effort to bring a defendant to trial, State v. Hastings, 120 N.H. 454, 455, 417 A.2d 7, 8 (1980), which is " 'not excused merely because the prisoner is incarcerated in another jurisdiction.' " Strickler v. State, ......
-
State v. Hughes, 90-445
...in this case is whether the earlier dismissal of a felony indictment against the defendant under the rule enunciated in State v. Hastings, 120 N.H. 454, 417 A.2d 7 (1980), bars this subsequent misdemeanor prosecution initiated by an information and alleging a lesser-included offense of the ......
-
State v. Pinder
...its face, and that the second was not brought within sixty days of the defendant's arrest, in violation of the rule in State v. Hastings, 120 N.H. 454, 417 A.2d 7 (1980). The motion was In August 1984, the defendant was tried before the superior court and was convicted under both the posses......
-
State v. Brown, 82-438
...based on the failure of the State to present an indictment within sixty days of his arrest as required by State v. Hastings, 120 N.H. 454, 455-56, 417 A.2d 7, 8 (1980). After a hearing, the Superior Court (Wyman, J.) denied the motion. On May 17, 1982, the defendant renewed his motion. Foll......