State v. Herrera-Lopez, S53463.
| Decision Date | 20 June 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. S53463.,S53463. |
| Parties | STATE v. HERRERA-LOPEZ. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Petition for review denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
State v. Barrett
..."that the bench and Bar might be well served by a decision resolving [a] central constitutional issue." State v. Herrera-Lopez , 204 Or. App. 188, 193, 129 P.3d 238, rev. den. , 341 Or. 140, 139 P.3d 258 (2006) (declining to determine whether Sixth Amendment rules announced in "Apprendi and......
-
State v. Tanner
...by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We are thus squarely faced with the same issue that we expressly reserved in State v. Herrera-Lopez, 204 Or.App. 188, 193, 129 P.3d 238, rev. den., 341 Or. 140, 139 P.3d 258 (2006).1 We conclude that the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences ......
-
State v. Nguyen
...and, therefore, intended to substantially interfere with her liberty. Furthermore, the state argues, relying on State v. Herrera-Lopez, 204 Or.App. 188, 195, 129 P.3d 238, rev. den., 341 Or. 140, 139 P.3d 258 (2006), that the sentencing court had the authority to impose a consecutive senten......
-
State v. Edwards
...definitions of the two offenses. We disagree with the state's characterization of those cases.For example, in State v. Herrera-Lopez , 204 Or. App. 188, 195, 129 P.3d 238, rev. den. , 341 Or. 140, 139 P.3d 258 (2006), we concluded that the defendant's plea petition and colloquy were suffici......
Request a trial to view additional results