State v. Hester
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | BLEASE, J. |
| Citation | State v. Hester, 134 S.E. 885, 137 S.C. 145 (S.C. 1926) |
| Decision Date | 04 October 1926 |
| Docket Number | 12077. |
| Parties | STATE v. HESTER et al. |
Appeal from General Sessions Circuit Court of Greenville County; H F. Rice, Judge.
Jerry M. Hester and others were convicted of murder, and they appeal. Reversed, and case remanded for new trial.
Cothran J., dissenting. [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
The following is the statement of J. C. Floyd referred to in the opinion:
The following is a portion of court's charge:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Brown v. State
... ... v. U.S. (C. C. A.), 57 F.2d 192, 197; Addis v. U.S ... (C. C. A.), 62 F.2d 329; Commonwealth v ... Belenski, 276 Mass. 35, 176 N.E. 501; Mack v ... State, 203 Ind. 355, 180 N.E. 279, 83 A.L.R. 1349; ... Hagood v. Commonwealth, 157 Va. 918, 162 S.E. 10, ... 601; State v. Hester, 137 S.C. 145, 162, 134 S.E ... 885; O'Steen v. State, 92 Fla. 1062, 1075, 111 ... So. 725; People v. Brott, 163 Mich. 150, 128 N.W ... 236; People v. Bartley, 12 Cal.App. 773, 108 P. 868, ... 870; State v. Frost, 134 Wash. 48, 50, 234 P. 1021 ... To my ... mind it would ... ...
-
Brown v. State
... ... U.S. (C ... C. A.), 57 F.2d 192, 197; Addis v. U.S. (C. C. A.), 62 F.2d ... 329; Commonwealth v. Belenski, 276 Mass. 35, 176 N.E. 501; ... Mack v. State, 203 Ind. 355, 180 N.E. 279, 83 A. L. R. 1349; ... Hagood v. Commonwealth, 157 Va. 918, 162 S.E. 10, 601; State ... v. Hester, 137 S.C. 145, 162, 134 S.E. 885; O'Steen v ... State, 92 Fla. 1062, 1075, 111 So. 725; People v. Brott, 163 ... Mich. 150, 128 N.W. 236; People v. Bartley, 12 Cal.App. 773, ... 108 P. 868, 870; State v. Frost, 134 Wash. 48, 50, 234 P ... To my ... mind it would be as becoming a ... ...
-
State v. Steadman
...to have been illegally seized, it would be admissible, State v. Kanellos, 122 S.C. 351, 115 S.E. 636. In the case of State v. Hester, 137 S.C. 145, 134 S.E. 885, 891, exception was taken that the entrapment by officers certain testimony incompetent. This court held: 'The fact that the offic......
-
Huff v. State
...156 U.S. 237, 242-243 [15 S.Ct. 337, 339-40, 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895) ]. " 'See also 5 Wigmore, Evidence §§ 1365, 1397 (3d ed.1940); State v. Hester, 137 S.C. 145, 189, 137 S.C. 145, 134 S.E. 885, 900 "Id., 380 U.S. at 418-19, 85 S.Ct. at 1076-77. This ruling is, of course, controlling as to thi......
-
Rule 901. Requirement of Authentication or Identification
...of "ancient" records under the hearsay rule. Subsection (b)(9) appears to be in accord with South Carolina law. See State v. Hester, 137 S.C. 145, 134 S.E. 885 (1926). Subsection (b)(10) is the federal rule modified to make the language applicable to South Carolina statutes and rules. An ex......
-
Rule 901. Requirement of Authentication or Identification
...of "ancient" records under the hearsay rule. Subsection (b)(9) appears to be in accord with South Carolina law. See State v. Hester, 137 S.C. 145, 134 S.E. 885 (1926). Subsection (b)(10) is the federal rule modified to make the language applicable to South Carolina statutes and rules. An ex......
-
Rule 901. Requirement of Authentication or Identification
...of "ancient" records under the hearsay rule. Subsection (b)(9) appears to be in accord with South Carolina law. See State v. Hester, 137 S.C. 145, 134 S.E. 885 (1926). Subsection (b)(10) is the federal rule modified to make the language applicable to South Carolina statutes and rules. An ex......
-
Rule 901. Requirement of Authentication or Identification
...of "ancient" records under the hearsay rule. Subsection (b)(9) appears to be in accord with South Carolina law. See State v. Hester, 137 S.C. 145, 134 S.E. 885 (1926). Subsection (b)(10) is the federal rule modified to make the language applicable to South Carolina statutes and rules. An ex......