State v. Hill
| Decision Date | 24 April 1996 |
| Citation | 75 Ohio St.3d 1453,663 N.E.2d 333 |
| Parties | State v. Hill NO. 95-202 |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Appeal from: Hamilton County, No. C-910916.
Reported at 75 Ohio St.3d 195, 661 N.E.2d 1068. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STRATTON, J., not participating.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Hill v. Mitchell
...aggravated robbery are set forth in numerous state court opinions, including the Ohio Supreme Court's published opinion in State v. Hill, 75 Ohio St. 3d 195 (1996):On May 31, 1991, defendant-appellant, Genesis Hill, crept into his girlfriend's apartment in Cincinnati and surreptitiously rem......
-
State v. Horton, 2007 Ohio 4309 (Ohio App. 8/23/2007)
... ... * * * ... Id. at ¶13 (citations omitted); see, also, United States v. Hill (C.A.6, 1992), 967 F.2d 226, 230-231, certiorari denied, 506 U.S. 964, 113 S.Ct. 438 ... {¶18} "Even if the identification procedure utilized is suggestive, as long as the identification itself is otherwise reliable the identification is admissible." Brust, supra, citing ... ...
-
State v. Teresa Renee Carpenter
... ... truth," and that Dr. Hicks was also truthful. It is not ... improper for the prosecution to comment fairly on the ... credibility of witnesses based on their in-court testimony ... Mundy, supra at 304; see also State v. Hill (1996), 75 Ohio ... St.3d 195, 204, 661 N.E.2d 1068, 1078, reconsideration ... denied, 75 Ohio St.3d 1453, 663 N.E.2d 333; State v. McCray ... (1995), 103 Ohio App.3d 109, 120-21, 658 N.E.2d 1076, 1083, ... discretionary appeal not allowed (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 1450 ... ...
-
State v. Sankey, 2006 Ohio 5316 (Ohio App. 10/10/2006)
... ... State v. Apanovitch (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 19, 24, 514 N.E.2d 394. Furthermore, "[i]solated comments by a prosecutor are not to be taken out of context and given their most damaging meaning." State v. Hill (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 195, 204, 661 N.E.2d 1068, recon. den., (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 1453, 663 N.E.2d 333. The appellant must show that there is a reasonable probability that but for the prosecutor's misconduct, the result of the proceeding would have been different. State v. Loza (1994), 71 Ohio ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results