State v. Hill
| Decision Date | 26 August 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 2008-1686.,2008-1686. |
| Citation | 122 Ohio St.3d 1497,912 N.E.2d 107,2009 Ohio 4221 |
| Parties | State v. Hill. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
Hill v. Anderson
... ... Michael J. Hendershot, Peter T. Reed, Stephen E. Maher, Benjamin M. Flowers, OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. Before: MERRITT, MOORE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges. OPINION PER CURIAM. 960 F.3d 265 Danny Hill asserts in his habeas petition that the State of Ohio may not execute him because he is intellectually disabled. 1 See Atkins v. Virginia , 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002). Atkins , the case that bars the execution of intellectually disabled defendants, was decided and made retroactive after Hill was convicted of ... ...
-
Hill v. Shoop
... ... In this death penalty habeas case, appellant Danny Hill seeks collateral review of his conviction for the murder of Raymond Fife, a twelve-year-old boy. The case has been to the Supreme Court once and before panels of this court twice. The core issue in the underlying state case was whether Hill was ineligible for the death penalty because he is intellectually disabled, a question that became pertinent after the Supreme Court's 2002 decision in Atkins v. Virginia ... 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002). Before us, the issues are whether, under ... ...
-
In re Hill
...(6th Cir. 2002). The state court determined that Hill was not intellectually disabled, so his death sentence stood. See State v. Hill, 912 N.E.2d 107 (Ohio 2009) (unpublished table decision); State v. Hill, 894 N.E.2d 108, 195 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008). With that, Hill moved to reopen his habeas......
-
Hill v. Anderson, s. 99-4317/14-3718
... ... Our court issued a remand order in 2002 directing the State of Ohio to assess Hills intellectual functioning in light of Atkins ... Hill v. Anderson , 300 F.3d 679 (6th Cir. 2002). The issue now before us is whether that assessment comports with Atkins and the Supreme Courts later opinions on the subject. We conclude that the courts in Ohio have ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results