State v. Howell
| Decision Date | 29 June 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 2327,2327 |
| Parties | STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Anthony Wayne HOWELL, Appellant. |
| Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.
Ross P. Lee, Phoenix, for appellant.
In this criminal appeal, Anthony Wayne Howell was informed against in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona, for robbery, Count 1, and assault with a deadly weapon, Count 2, to which charges he pleaded not guilty. Robbery is punishable by imprisonment for not less than five years. A.R.S. § 13--643. On November 19, 1970, the State filed an amended information for grand theft from the person, a felony, accompanied by a stipulation in these words:
'It is hereby stipulated by defendant and his counsel that this amended information is filed without objection for the purpose of entering a plea of guilty; it is further stipulated that if at a subsequent time this plea be withdrawn for any reason, this information may be reamended without objection to allege the charge contained in the original information.'
The stipulation was signed by the defendant, by the public defender and a deputy county attorney. To the amended charge, defendant entered a plea of guilty. He was sentenced on the sixth day of January 1971 to imprisonment for not less than six nor more than eight years to date from the time of his arrest, August 1970.
Thereafter, the defendant filed a notice of appeal directed to the Court of Appeals, Division One, State of Arizona, appealing from the judgment and sentence pronounced upon him. On May 28, 1971, the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, being of the opinion that because the original information charging robbery carried a possible sentence of life imprisonment and because if defendant obtained a reversal, upon return to the Superior Court the former information might be reinstated, whereupon the criminal action would involve crimes over which the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction, caused the record to be transmitted to the Clerk of this Court, where it was docketed as Criminal Cause 2327.
The jurisdiction and venue of the Court of Appeals is provided by A.R.S § 12--120.21. Subsection A reads:
'A. The court of appeals shall have:
1. Appellate jurisdiction in all actions and proceedings originating in or permitted by law to be appealed from the superior court, Except criminal actions involving crimes punishable by death or life imprisonment.' (Emphasis added.)
Jurisdiction depends upon the state of affairs existing at the time it is invoked, Gardner v. Gardner, 253 S.C. 296, 170 S.E.2d 372, and once having attached is not lost by subsequent events. Atlantic Corporation v. United States, 1 Cir., 311 F.2d 907. Under the Arizona enactment A.R.S. § 12--120.21, jurisdiction is dependent upon the punishment which is to be imposed under the charge.
The Clerk of this Court is ordered to transmit to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals Division One, the record in this cause, with directions that it be entered upon the files of that court for disposition according to law.
Unlike the Superior Court and the Supreme Court, both of which are constitutional courts, the Court of Appeals under our Constitution (Art. 6, § 1), A.R.S. is a creation of the legislature, A.R.S. § 12--120, et seq., and has only such jurisdiction as the legislature in its wisdom provides. Two statutes are pertinent in this regard:
§ 12--120.21 A.R.S. (emphasis added)
And:
'The State, or any party to a prosecution by indictment or information, may appeal to the court of appeals as prescribed by law and in the manner provided by the rules of criminal procedure, except criminal actions involving Crimes punishable by death or life imprisonment which may be appealed to the supreme court.' § 13--1711 A.R.S. (emphasis added)
The Court of Appeals, Division One, in discussing its jurisdiction early in the operation of that court stated:
'Since the court of appeals has only jurisdiction in matters specifically given to the court in the statute, we are of the opinion that the correct import of these two sections read together is that a person desiring to appeal a case involving a crime Punishable by death or life imprisonment may appeal if he wishes but if he does wish to appeal he must appeal the matter to the supreme court since the court of appeals being one of limited jurisdiction by statute,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Peoples, In re
...& St. Louis Railroad Co. v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.,270 U.S. 580, 46 S.Ct. 402, 70 L.Ed. 743 (1926); State v. Howell, 107 Ariz. 300, 486 P.2d 782 (1971); Gardner v. Gardner, 253 S.C. 296, 170 S.E.2d 372 (1969). Jurisdiction over the person of a defendant or respondent is obtained b......
-
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Foust
...v. RTC, 938 F.2d 383, 392 n. 12 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 981, 112 S.Ct. 582, 116 L.Ed.2d 608 (1991); State v. Howell, 107 Ariz. 300, 301, 486 P.2d 782, 783 (1971) (authority derived from A.R.S. § 12-120.21); Botschafter, 603 N.E.2d at 239; Berke, 483 N.W.2d at 715 (quoting F. Alder......
-
Inspiration Consol. Copper Co. v. Arizona Dept. of Revenue
... ... The Department's valuation, which was affirmed by the State Board of Tax Appeals, set the 1980 full cash value for the mine at $49,000,000. After a three and one-half week trial, the superior court found that ... ...
-
State v. Fimbres
...153 Ariz. at 93, 734 P.2d at 1049, and, once established, cannot be lost as the result of later events. Cf. State v. Howell, 107 Ariz. 300, 301, 486 P.2d 782, 783 (1971) (subject matter "[j]urisdiction depends upon the state of affairs existing at the time it is invoked, and once having att......