State v. Jack
Decision Date | 27 November 1903 |
Citation | 20 Del. 470,58 A. 833 |
Court | Court of General Sessions of Delaware |
Parties | STATE v. CHARLES W. JACK |
Court of General Sessions, New Castle County, November Term, 1903.
INDICTMENT FOR ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT MURDER.
At the trial, Doctor James R. Mahaffy, a veterinary physician, the prosecuting witness, who was assaulted by the defendant on the thirteenth of October, 1903, testified in substance concerning the assault, as follows:
That the defendant called upon him on the day of the assault, at his office No. 904 Jackson Street, in the City of Wilmington and stated that he had a friend out at Blue Ball who had two horses hurt and asked if the doctor would go out to see them stating that he had been at the office in the morning and was informed that the doctor was out but that he would be in about one o'clock, and that he had therefore come back for him.
Mahaffy informed the defendant that he would be ready to go with him in about one-half or three-quarters of an hour and asked him where the place was located where his services were wanted. That Jack, the defendant, told him to "go out the Concord Pike, turn to your right at the blacksmith shop at Blue Ball, and then turn out the cross-roads." That Jack then stated that if the doctor would go right away and come right back, he would go out with him, to which the doctor assented. That Jack then went with the doctor to the latter's hospital where he was treating some horses, and when that work was finished they both got in the doctor's buggy and drove down Washington Street, and out across Washington Street Bridge to the Concord Pike; Jack directing the doctor (after turning to the right at the blacksmith shop at Blue Ball) as to the road to the place where the alleged horses were sick, viz., one Mr. Miller's. After making several turns they passed a certain farm-house and the defendant said, "It is the next farm down here" that they came to that farm and he then said, "I did not mean this one, I meant the next one on the left." That the doctor started to drive to the next farm on the left and Jack said, "Wait a moment, I am a little mixed on this myself," and started to get out of the buggy, but seeing some men working in a field near the road he called to them and asked where Mr. Miller lived, and they said, "The next farm on your right." Witness then continued:
The doctor's injuries were a wound made by a bullet...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Searcy
...59 P. 169 (1899); State v. McCullough, 114 Iowa 532, 87 N.W. 503 (1901); Doherty v. State, 73 Vt. 380, 50 A. 1113 (1901); State v. Jack, 20 Del. 470, 58 A. 833 (1903); State v. McGruder, 125 Iowa 741, 101 N.W. 646 (1904); State v. Lyons, 113 La. 959, 37 So. 890 (1904); Territory v. Kennedy,......
-
State v. Brewington
... ... State v. Hurley, Houst. Cr ... Cas. 28, 36; State v. Thomas, Houst. Cr. Cas ... 511, 526, 529; State v. Bowen, Houst. Cr. Cas. 91, ... 96; State v. Kavanaugh, 20 Del. 131, 4 ... Penne. 131, 53 A. 335; State v. Di ... Guglielmo, 4 Penne. 336, 55 A. 350; State ... v. Jack, 20 Del. 470, 4 Penne. 470, 475, 58 A ... 833; State v. Truitt, 21 Del. 466, 5 Penne ... 466, 62 A. 790; State v. Adams, 22 Del. 178, 6 ... Penne. 178, 65 A. 510 ... Verdict, ... ...