State v. Jackson, 83-674
| Citation | 436 So.2d 985 |
| Decision Date | 02 August 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-674,83-674 |
| Parties | The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Mark JACKSON, Respondent. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Penny Hershoff Brill, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Smoley & Grate and Joseph H. Weil, Miami, for respondent.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
The respondent is charged with armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony.
During preparation for a second trial of respondent (a prior trial had resulted in a conviction and reversal on appeal), counsel for respondent served Loula Kyles with a subpoena for deposition. She failed to appear at the designated time, whereupon the trial court ordered the state to produce the witness. The state failed to produce the witness as ordered. Several other notices to appear were not responded to by Kyles. Respondent moved to exclude the witness on the basis of her numerous failures to appear. The trial court granted the respondent's motion to exclude the witness by written order.
The state has petitioned for common law certiorari to quash the order granting respondent's motion to exclude. We find merit in the state's petition and quash the order under review.
It is not the responsibility of the state to produce a witness subpoenaed by a defendant for discovery purposes; to order the state to do so, or to dismiss a criminal case for failure of the state to do so, constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law. State v. Adderly, 411 So.2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Knight v. State, 373 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 761 (Fla.1980); State ex rel. Gerstein v. Durant, 348 So.2d 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); State v. Roig, 305 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
The petition for certiorari is granted and the order under review is quashed. It is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Vixamar, 95-3458
...DCA 1989), State v. Bryant, 549 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), State v. Rojas, 508 So.2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and State v. Jackson, 436 So.2d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Its argument is, essentially, that the judge should have afforded the state a continuance to produce the witness and the A......
-
State v. Gonzalez, 96-2823
...a witness subpoenaed by a defendant for discovery purposes. State v. Cecil, 533 So.2d 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Jackson, 436 So.2d 985, 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Banks, 349 So.2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); State v. Roig, 305 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). In Knight v. State, 373 S......
-
State v. Boykins
...; State v. Cecil, 533 So. 2d 884, 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ; State v. Rodriguez, 483 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) ; State v. Jackson, 436 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) ; State v. Adderly, 411 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) ; State v. Banks, 349 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (disapproved on ot......
-
State v. Filipowich, 87-1355
...failure of the state to comply with such an order affords no basis for excluding the witness' testimony at trial. State v. Jackson, 436 So.2d 985, 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); see State v. Adderly, 411 So.2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Knight v. State, 373 So.2d 52, 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. den......