State v. Johnson

Decision Date02 December 1959
Docket NumberNo. 437,437
Citation251 N.C. 339,111 S.E.2d 297
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE, v. James Alford JOHNSON.

Malcolm B. Seawell, Atty. Gen., T. W. Bruton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

H. F. Seawell, Jr., Carthage, for defendant appellant.

WINBORNE, Chief Justice.

In the light of what transpired in the Municipal Recorder's Court of Aberdeen and in Superior Court of Moore County as reflected by the foregoing statement of the case, the Supreme Court is impelled, ex mero motu, to inquire into the jurisdiction of the Municipal Recorder's Court of Aberdeen and the legality of proceedings had.

In this connection this Court has before it what purports to be a copy of Resolution of Board of Commissioners of The Town of Aberdeen, certified by Clerk of Municipal Recorder's Court of Aberdeen, establishing 'by virtue of Chapter 7, Articles 24 and 29A, and other applicable Articles of the General Statutes of North Carolina,' 'the Municipal Recorder's Court of Aberdeen with jurisdiction as set forth in said chapter of the General Statutes, namely Chapter 7 * * * to attach as of 9:00 P.M., on Wednesday, August 6, 1956.'

Assuming this to be the establishment and the vesting of jurisdiction of the Municipal Recorder's Court of Aberdeen, we turn to the pertinent provisions of General Statutes:

(1) Criminal jurisdiction is set forth in G.S. § 7-190;

(2) Provision for appeal to Superior Court is found in G.S. § 7-195, as follows: 'Any person convicted of any offense of which the recorder has final jurisdiction may appeal to the superior court of the county from any judgment or sentence of the recorder, in the same manner as is now provided for appeals from courts of justices of the peace * * *'; and

(3) Pertaining to jury trial, G.S. § 7-204, it appears that 'in all trials in the court, upon demand for a jury trial by the defendant or the prosecuting attorney representing the State, the recorder shall try the same as is now provided in actions before justices of the peace wherein a jury is demanded, and the same procedure as is now provided by law for jury trials before justices of the peace shall apply * * *.'

Thus it appears that a jury trial may be had in the Municipal Recorder's Court of Aberdeen, and that from a conviction of any offense of which the recorder has final jurisdiction an appeal may be taken to the Superior Court of the county. Since neither course was followed, the Superior Court was without authority to proceed to trial...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State Carolina v. Petty
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 7 Junio 2011
    ...appeal in the event that the defendant was not tried and convicted in the District Court division, State v. Johnson, 251 N.C. 339, 340–41, 111 S.E.2d 297, 298–99 (1959), or if a warrant is substantially amended in the Superior Court division so as to charge an offense different from that fo......
  • State v. Wesson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 20 Diciembre 1972
    ...be tried de novo in the superior court on the original warrant without a trial and conviction in the district court. State v. Johnson, 251 N.C. 339, 111 S.E.2d 297 (1959). G.S. § 7A--290 provides in '* * * Any defendant Convicted in district court before the judge may appeal to superior cou......
  • State v. Felmet
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 27 Enero 1981
    ...298 N.C. 191, 257 S.E.2d 426 (1979); State v. Guffey, supra; State v. Evans, 262 N.C. 492, 137 S.E.2d 811 (1964); State v. Johnson, 251 N.C. 339, 111 S.E.2d 297 (1959). When the record is silent and the appellate court is unable to determine whether the court below had jurisdiction, the app......
  • Spriggs v. State of North Carolina
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • 9 Julio 1965
    ...and convicted on the original warrant in the inferior court. State v. Doughtie, 238 N.C. 228, 77 S.E.2d 642 (1953); State v. Johnson, 251 N.C. 339, 111 S.E.2d 297 (1959). Therefore, petitioner may attack the jurisdiction of the Superior Court by attacking the absence of the original warrant......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT