State v. Jones
| Decision Date | 16 March 1882 |
| Parties | STATE v. BENJAMIN L. JONES. |
| Court | Maine Supreme Court |
ON motion to dismiss the indictment.
Indictment for assault and battery.
The terms of the report provided that if this court has original jurisdiction, and the indictment can legally be found by the grand jury, the case was to stand for trial; otherwise a discontinuance was to be entered.
H. B Cleaves, attorney general, for the State, cited: Priv. stat 1850, c. 166; 1852, c. 283; 1854, c. 360, § 11; 1861, c 78; R. S., c. 132, § 4; stat. 1879, c. 114; John Hersom, Petitioner, 39 Me. 476.
D N. Mortland, for the defendant, contended that the police court of Rockland, had exclusive jurisdiction of the offense charged in the indictment, by the act establishing the court, stat. 1861, c. 78, and cited, State v. Billington, 33 Me. 146.
This is an indictment in common form for assault and battery. The motion is to dismiss the indictment because it is for a minor offense, a subject for complaint and not indictment, exclusively within the jurisdiction of the police court of Rockland.
By § 4, c. 132, R. S., judges of municipal and police courts, and trial justices, have jurisdiction of assaults and batteries when the offense is not of a high and aggravated character. But it is not therein or elsewhere prescribed that they shall have exclusive jurisdiction in such cases.
Section 1, c. 131, R. S., provides, that " the Supreme Judicial Court shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive or concurrent, of all criminal offenses, except those of which the jurisdiction is conferred by law on municipal and police courts and trial justices, and appellate jurisdiction of these." This section is a combination of several previously existing statutory provisions, and the meaning at first view may not be clear. But the words " the jurisdiction," in their connection in this section, mean more than the word jurisdiction simply would imply. Here the words mean all (original) jurisdiction, or the exclusive (original) jurisdiction. Otherwise the words in the section, " or concurrent," would have no meaning. The case of State v. Mullen, 72 Me. 466, is decisive of this case.
Further: By § 28, c. 118, R. S., the offense of assault and battery is punishable by imprisonment less than one year, or by fine not exceeding two hundred dollars, and by c. 82, laws of 1872, the punishment is enlarged so as not to exceed five years in the state prison, or a fine of one thousand dollars. And now an assault and battery may be a felony. State v. Goddard, 69 Me. 181. Of course an aggravated assault and battery would ordinarily be beyond the jurisdiction of police courts or trial justices. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lemieux v. Robbins
...over to the grand jury for further proceedings by indictment in the Superior Court. 4 M.R.S.A. § 171 (1964); M.R.Crim.P. 5(c); State v. Jones, 73 Me. 280 (1882). Trial by jury has never been available to a criminal defendant in the Maine District Courts. 3 Glassman, Maine Practice, Rules of......
-
Ex parte Whitehouse
...between the courts created, and gave to the county court exclusive jurisdiction of this class of misdemeanors. In the case of State v. Jones, 73 Me. 280, the court in a statute giving to the police court of Rockland exclusive jurisdiction said: "The act establishing the police court of Rock......
-
Rell v. State
...without specifying the means by which it was accomplished has been deemed sufficient regardless of the enormity of the offense. In State v. Jones, 73 Me. 280, it was said: "We cannot know of what grade the offense is by the allegations. There is no necessity of alleging particular enormitie......
-
State v. Cram
...depend upon the proof adduced, and not upon the facts alleged. The proof may constitute it a felony, or only a petty misdemeanor. State v. Jones, 73 Me. 280. It cannot, therefore, be anticipated that these respondents would, if sentenced by the superior court, be punished by more than a fin......