State v. Ketterer, 2007-1261

Decision Date01 November 2010
Docket Number2007-1261,2007-2425
PartiesState v. Ketterer
CourtOhio Supreme Court

126 Ohio St.3d 448
2010 Ohio 3831

State
v.
Ketterer

2007-1261
2007-2425

Supreme Court of Ohio

Dated: November 1, 2010


SLIP OPINIONS REPLACED BY OHIO OFFICIAL REPORTS VERSIONS AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2010

The official versions of the opinions listed below, which were previously released as slip opinions, have been published in the November 1, 2010 Ohio Official Reports advance sheet. These opinions should now be cited using the Ohio Official Reports citation format.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Davis v. Shoop
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • June 16, 2020
    ...by res judciata for failure to raise the claim on direct appeal, and was also meritless. Id. at PageID 6485-86, citing State v. Ketterer, 126 Ohio St. 3d 448, 2010-Ohio-3831, ¶ 59. On November 26, 2012, the trial court issued an Entry and Order dismissing the petition and denying Davis's mo......
  • Rhodes v. Warden, Case No. 2:16-cv-0074
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • April 7, 2017
    ...State v. Snider, No. 2010-CA-00128, 2011 WL 684167, at *2 (Ohio App. 5th Dist. Feb. 22, 2011)(same)(citing State v. Ketterer, 126 Ohio St.3d 448 (2010)); see also State v. Steimle, Nos. 82183, 82184, 2003 WL 22100658, at *2 (Ohio App. 8th Dist. Sept. 11, 2003)("The doctrine of res judicata ......
  • State Of Ohio v. Christie
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • February 4, 2011
    ...filing the original appeal has passed. State v. Coats, 3d Dist. Nos. 10-10-05, 1010-06, 2010-Ohio-4822, 118, citing State v. Ketterer, 126 Ohio St.3d 448, 2010-Ohio-3831, ¶61. Second, even if the trial court had authority to consider the motion, a decision that could have been appealed to t......
  • State v. Vale
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • November 21, 2023
    ...that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'" State v. Ketterer, 126 Ohio St.3d 448, 2010-Ohio-3831, ¶ 23, quoting United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682 (1985)." 'The mere possibility that an item of undisclosed informat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT