State v. Kinard
| Decision Date | 18 March 2020 |
| Docket Number | Appellate Case No. 2019-001604,Opinion No. 27955 |
| Citation | 840 S.E.2d 924 (Mem),429 S.C. 614 |
| Parties | The STATE of South Carolina, Petitioner, v. Tony Latrell KINARD, Respondent. |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch Jr., both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Matthew Stumbo, of Greenwood, all for Petitioner.
Richard James Dolce, of Richard J. Dolce, Attorney at Law, and Michael Vincent Laubshire, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Kinard , 427 S.C. 367, 831 S.E.2d 138 (Ct. App. 2019). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
State v. Taylor
...components under State v. Kinard , 427 S.C. 367, 831 S.E.2d 138 (Ct. App. 2019), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted , 429 S.C. 614, 840 S.E.2d 924 (2020), and State v. Sawyer , 409 S.C. 475, 763 S.E.2d 183 (2014). We agree with Taylor. A question of statutory interpretation is a quest......
- In re Drose