State v. LePard, 500

Decision Date19 April 1967
Docket NumberNo. 500,500
Citation270 N.C. 157,153 S.E.2d 875
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Bernard J. LePARD.

Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton and Asst. Atty. Gen. Millard R. Rich, Jr., for the State.

W. L. Thompson and Earle R. Purser, Raleigh, for defendant.

PER CURIAM.

The sentence imposed does not exceed the maximum sentence authorized by G.S. § 14--87 for the offense of robbery with firearms. It is well established that a sentence which does not exceed the maximum prescribed by statute for the offense of which the defendant has been convicted or of which he has entered a plea of guilty does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by Article I, § 14, of the Constitution of North Carolina. State v. Bruce, 268 N.C. 174, 150 S.E.2d 216; State v. Downey, 253 N.C. 348, 117 S.E.2d 39; State v. Lee, 247 N.C. 230, 100 S.E.2d 372; State v. Smith, 238 N.C. 82, 76 S.E.2d 363; State v. Daniels, 197 N.C. 285, 148 S.E. 244. The record reveals no violation of any constitutional right of the defendant or any error in the judgment of which he complains or in the proceedings leading thereto.

No error.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • State v. Weston, s. 33 and 34
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 20, 1968
    ...not constitute cruel and unusual punishment as forbidden by Article I, Section 14 of the Constitution of North Carolina. State v. LePard, 270 N.C. 157, 153 S.E.2d 875. We have carefully examined defendant's remaining assignments of error and find no prejudicial error affecting the charge of......
  • State v. Slade
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 7, 1976
    ...the statute will not be considered cruel and unusual punishment. State v. Weston, 273 N.C. 275, 159 S.E.2d 883 (1968); State v. LePard,270 N.C. 157, 153 S.E.2d 875 (1967). Further, as long as a sentence is within the statutory limits, the punishment imposed by a trial judge is in his discre......
  • State v. Barrow
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 7, 1977
    ...(1972); State v. Rogers, 275 N.C. 411, 168 S.E.2d 345 (1969); State v. Robinson, 271 N.C. 448, 156 S.E.2d 854 (1967); State v. LePard, 270 N.C. 157, 153 S.E.2d 875 (1967); State v. Greer, 270 N.C. 143, 153 S.E.2d 849 (1967); State v. Taborn, 268 N.C. 445, 150 S.E.2d 779 (1966); State v. Bru......
  • State v. Powell, 6921SC416
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 27, 1969
    ...247 N.C. 230, 100 S.E.2d 372; State v. Downey, 253 N.C. 348, 117 S.E.2d 39; State v. Bruce, 268 N.C. 174, 150 S.E.2d 216; State v. LePard, 270 N.C. 157, 153 S.E.2d 875; State v. Robinson, 271 N.C. 448, 156 S.E.2d 854; State v. Lovelace, 271 N.C. 593, 157 S.E.2d 81; State v. Yoes, 271 N.C. 6......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT