State v. Lucas
| Decision Date | 17 November 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 82877,82877 |
| Parties | 19 Fla. L. Weekly S590 STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. David F. LUCAS, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen. and James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Lynn A. Williams and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for respondent.
We have for review Lucas v. State, 630 So.2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified the following question as being of great public importance:
WHEN A DEFENDANT HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF EITHER MANSLAUGHTER OR A GREATER OFFENSE NOT MORE THAN ONE STEP REMOVED, DOES FAILURE TO EXPLAIN JUSTIFIABLE AND EXCUSABLE HOMICIDE AS PART OF THE MANSLAUGHTER INSTRUCTION ALWAYS CONSTITUTE BOTH "FUNDAMENTAL" AND PER SE REVERSIBLE ERROR, WHICH MAY BE RAISED FOR THE FIRST TIME ON APPEAL AND MAY NOT BE SUBJECTED TO A HARMLESS-ERROR ANALYSIS, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE EVIDENCE COULD SUPPORT A FINDING OF EITHER JUSTIFIABLE OR EXCUSABLE HOMICIDE?
630 So.2d at 600. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.
David F. Lucas was charged with armed robbery, kidnapping, sexual battery and attempted second-degree murder. At trial, Lucas' defense was that although the crimes charged had occurred, he was not the perpetrator. At defense counsel's request, the trial court gave the jury an instruction on attempted manslaughter as a category-one lesser-included offense of attempted second-degree murder. However, the court failed to explain that Lucas could not be found guilty of attempted manslaughter if the evidence showed that the attempted homicide was justifiable or excusable. Lucas did not object to the omission. The jury found him guilty on all four counts.
Lucas appealed the attempted second-degree murder conviction, maintaining that the court's failure to explain justifiable and excusable homicide as part of the attempted manslaughter instruction was fundamental error, requiring reversal. Looking to this Court's decisions in Rojas v. State, 552 So.2d 914 (Fla.1989), and Miller v. State, 573 So.2d 337 (Fla.1991), the district court agreed and certified the above question. 630 So.2d at 599-600.
We have repeatedly recognized that because manslaughter is a "residual offense, defined by reference to what it is not," a complete instruction on manslaughter requires an explanation that justifiable and excusable homicide are excluded from the crime. Stockton v. State, 544 So.2d 1006, 1008 (Fla.1989); see also Armstrong v. State, 579 So.2d 734 (Fla.1991); Rojas; Miller; State v. Smith, 573 So.2d 306 (Fla.1990); Hedges v. State, 172 So.2d 824 (Fla.1965). The district...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lowe v. State
...error analysis exception "where defense counsel affirmatively agreed to or requested the incomplete instruction." State v. Lucas , 645 So.2d 425, 427 (Fla. 1994), receded from on other grounds by State v. Spencer , 216 So.3d 481 (Fla. 2017). However, we also recognized in that context that ......
-
Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. Buster
... ... Steven Wisotsky and Stephen J. Bronis of Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP, Miami, Florida, and Charles T. Shad of Saalfield, Shad, Jay, Lucas, and Stokes, P.A., Jacksonville, Florida, for Appellant/Petitioner ... Thomas K. Equels, J. Stanley Chapman, and Judson H. Orrick ... provider that caused or could have caused injury to or death of a patient, including, but not limited to, those incidents that are required by state or federal law to be reported to any governmental agency or body, and incidents that are reported to or reviewed by any health care facility peer ... ...
-
State v. Spencer
...objected to the instructions as given. See id. The First District determined that it was bound by this Court's decision in State v. Lucas , 645 So.2d 425 (Fla. 1994), which held that the failure to instruct on justifiable or excusable homicide as part of the manslaughter instruction constit......
-
Bay Farms Corp. v. Great Am. Alliance Ins. Co.
... ... As originally enacted, this statutory provision provided in pertinent part: (1) Every insurer authorized to transact property insurance in this state shall make available coverage for insurable sinkhole losses on any structure, including contents of personal property contained therein, to the ... ...