State v. Marana Plantations, Inc.

Decision Date15 January 1953
Docket NumberNo. 1033,1033
Citation252 P.2d 87,75 Ariz. 111
PartiesSTATE v. MARANA PLANTATIONS, Inc.
CourtArizona Supreme Court

Fred O. Wilson, Atty. Gen., and Robert Morrison, County Attorney of Pima County, Tucson, for appellant.

Darnell, Robertson & Holesapple, of Tucson, for appellee.

WINDES, Justice.

The State, by and through the county attorney of Pima County, filed a direct information consisting of six counts charging the Marana Plantations, Inc., with violating certain regulations adopted by the State Board of Health pursuant to the provision of Chapter 105, Session Laws 1941. The trial court dismissed the action for the reason that the statute enabling the board to pass the regulation is unconstitutional in that it delegated legislative power to an administrative board and for the further reason that the regulations were unconstitutional in that they were discriminatory and were of a local or special nature.

The source of the board's power to pass the questioned regulations, if any, is to be found in the following provision of Section 6, Chapter 105, 1941 Session Laws of Arizona:

'Sec. 6. Rules and regulations. (a) The board shall have power to adopt, promulgate, repeal, and amend rules and regulations consistent with law to: 1. define and control communicable diseases; 2. prevent and control public health nuisances; 3. regulate sanitation and sanitary practices in the interests of public health; 4. cooperate with local boards of health and health officers; 5. protect and promote the public health and prevent disability and mortality; 6. isolate any person affected with and prevent the spread of any contagious or infectious disease; 7. govern the transportation of dead bodies; 8. establish quarantine; and, 9. carry out the purposes of this Act.'

The regulations involved are by their terms made applicable only to agricultural labor camps, and the information charges the violation of regulations Nos. 101 to 106 inclusive which read as follows:

'Regulation 101--Water Supply: Every labor camp shall be provided with a water supply from a source approved by the State Director of Health or the local health department having jurisdiction.

'The water supply shall be of sufficient quantity to provide a minimum of 35 gallons per person per day to the camp site at a rate of two and a half times the average hourly demand, and be of a safe sanitary quality, meeting the standards of the State Department of Health.

'No cross- or back-flow connections with unapproved water supplies or other possible sources of contamination shall be permitted.

'Regulation 103--Toilets: Every camp shall be provided with suitable toilets with disposal systems meeting the requirements of the State Department of Health contained in regulations 30 through 32 inclusive, or if privies are used they shall meet the requirements of regulation 33 of the sanitary code. One toilet or one privy shall be provided for every 15 persons or fraction thereof in the camp population. Privies shall be located at least 125 feet from any domestic source of water and shall at all times be maintained in good repair and in a clean, fly-tight, and sanitary condition. No living unit shall be more than 200 feet from toilet facilities.

'Regulation 103--Bathing: Every camp shall be provided with an adequate supply of hot and cold or tempered running water and all other necessary facilities for washing the hands, faces and bodies of the camp occupants. One shower head for each 20 persons or fraction thereof shall be provided.

'Regulation 104--Housing: The following minimum housing shall be provided:

'Family unit living quarters shall provide at least 60 square feet per occupant. When single or unattached workers are housed, 40 square feet of floor space shall be provided for each occupant.

'The window area shall be least 1/8 of the floor space and all openings shall be effectively screened. Water under pressure shall be available within 50 feet of each living unit. Dirt floors shall not be permitted.

'After July 1, 1953, tent houses shall not be permitted. When heating is provided for any camp housing such heating units shall be properly vented to the outside atmosphere as directed by the local health authority. Adequate ventilation shall be provided.

'The State Director of Health shall have the authority to waive parts of this regulation where health conditions are not impaired.

'Regulation 105--Fire Protection: Every camp shall be equipped with fire fighting equipment such as fire hydrants and hose, water barrels and buckets, sand barrels, chemical extinguishers and shovels. The camp owner shall provide whichever equipment is most feasible. If water barrels are provided, larviciding will be necessary to prevent mosquito breeding.

'Regulation 106--Garbage: A sufficient number of water-tight metal garbage containers with tight-fitting lids shall be provided. These containers shall be emptied and cleaned at least twice weekly by a collection service provided by the owner of the camp. Garbage shall be disposed of by the sanitary land fill method or other method approved by local health authority at a site approved by the local health authority. Fly breeding prevention methods shall be...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Southwest Engineering Co. v. Ernst
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • December 20, 1955
    ...to an administrative agency the power to adopt rules and regulations necessary to carry a law into effect. State v. Marana Plantations, 75 Ariz. 111, 114, 252 P.2d 87. In some cases such as zoning and the licensing of professions, the discretion vested is so broad and the limitation so gene......
  • American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. Hull
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Arizona
    • July 3, 2001
    ...and determine for itself the conditions under which a law should exist and pass the law it thinks appropriate. State v. Marana Plantations, 75 Ariz. 111, 252 P.2d 87, 89 (1953) (emphasis With § 5-601, there are few express conditions imposed by the legislature. The Arizona Supreme Court rec......
  • Bade v. Drachman
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • August 17, 1966
    ...board or agency with no prescribed restraint offends the Constitution as a delegation of legislative power. State v. Marana Plantations, (Inc.,) 75 Ariz. 111, 252 P.2d 87. What the legislature cannot do is to delegate to an administrative body or official not only the power to fix a rate of......
  • Camerena v. Department of Public Welfare
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 1969
    ...be unconstitutional. See Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise Cuonty, 92 Ariz. 395, 377 P.2d 770 (1963); and State v. Marana Plantations, Inc., 75 Ariz. 111, 252 P.2d 87 (1953). We do not agree, however, that there is an improper delegation of legislative authority in A.R.S. § 46--292, subse......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT