State v. Marcello

Citation157 Vt. 657,599 A.2d 357
Decision Date19 September 1991
Docket NumberNo. 90-125,90-125
PartiesSTATE of Vermont, v. Richard MARCELLO.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Vermont

Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.

ENTRY ORDER

Defendant appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and Chapter I, Article 11, of the Vermont Constitution, contending that a state trooper did not have reasonable suspicion to justify stopping defendant's vehicle. The trial court held that the trooper had probable cause to stop defendant. We disagree and hold that the trooper lacked probable cause or reasonable suspicion of criminal activity; however, the stop was justified on other grounds. Therefore, we affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress.

On October 16, 1989, a motorist driving north on Interstate 89 told a state trooper driving in the same direction to stop defendant's car, because "[t]here's something wrong with that man." The trooper stopped both motorists based on this information. The trooper later arrested defendant for violating 23 V.S.A. § 1201(a)(2), which prohibits operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, after observing obvious signs of intoxication. Defendant entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of the stop. See V.R.Cr.P. 11.

Generally, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Chapter I, Article 11, of the Vermont Constitution require that police officers have reasonable and articulable suspicion that someone is engaged in criminal activity, or is violating a motor vehicle law, before conducting an investigatory stop. Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Siergiey, 155 Vt. 78, 80-81, 582 A.2d 119, 120-21 (1990); State v. Emilo, 144 Vt. 477, 481, 479 A.2d 169, 171 (1984). Here, the trooper had no reasonable and articulable suspicion that defendant was committing a crime because she did not see him engage in any unusual behavior, or violate any motor vehicle law. Therefore, the trial court's ruling that the trooper had probable cause to stop defendant was clearly erroneous.

In some circumstances, however, police officers without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity are allowed to intrude on a person's privacy to carry out "community caretaking" functions to enhance public safety. Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433, 441, 93 S.Ct. 2523, 2528, 37 L.Ed.2d 706 (1973); see also Crauthers v. State, 727 P.2d 9, 10-11 (Alaska 1986) (requests for assistance from the public fall within a law enforcement...

To continue reading

Request your trial
57 cases
  • State v. Calabrese
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • 29 Octubre 2021
    ...and consonant with the lawful purpose for which the officer was on the property—to conduct a welfare check. Cf. State v. Marcello, 157 Vt. 657, 658, 599 A.2d 357, 358 (1991) (mem.) (explaining that in some circumstances "police officers without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity are ......
  • Wilson v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 18 Abril 1994
    ...in Dombrowski, 413 U.S. at 441, 93 S.Ct. at 2528, permits police to act in a manner that enhances public safety. State v. Marcello, 157 Vt. 657, 599 A.2d 357, 358 (1991). The police officer's observation of specific and articulable facts, Wilson's lunging walk with a severe limp, reasonably......
  • Wright v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 15 Diciembre 1999
    ...(N.M. Ct. App. 1993); Provo City v. Warden, 844 P.2d 360, 362-65 (Utah Ct. App. 1992), aff'd, 875 P.2d 557 (Utah 1994); State v. Marcello, 599 A.2d 357, 358 (Vt. 1991); Barrett v. Commonwealth, 447 S.E.2d 243, 245-46 (Va. Ct. App. 1994) (upon reh'g, en banc); State v. Chisholm, 696 P.2d 41,......
  • Williams v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • 2 Diciembre 2008
    ...investigating "abnormal" driving behavior in the middle of the night involves "community caretaker function"); State v. Marcello, 157 Vt. 657, 599 A.2d 357, 358 (1991) ("In some circumstances ... police officers without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity are allowed to intrude on a p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT