State v. Matthews

Decision Date17 April 2018
Docket NumberWD 80247
Citation552 S.W.3d 674
Parties STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dennis Judson MATTHEWS, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

552 S.W.3d 674

STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Dennis Judson MATTHEWS, Appellant.

WD 80247

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Filed: April 17, 2018
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 29, 2018
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 21, 2018


Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, for appellant.

Danil N. MCPherson, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Anthony Rex Gabbert, JJ.

Alok Ahuja, Judge

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Clay County, Dennis Matthews was convicted of one count of abuse of a child resulting in death; two counts of abuse of a child; and four counts of endangering the welfare of a child. Matthews

552 S.W.3d 677

was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment plus 42 years, and a $5,000 fine. He appeals.

Matthews' wife Rebecca Matthews was convicted of similar offenses, arising out of the same underlying events which formed the basis for Matthews' prosecution. We reversed Rebecca Matthews' convictions in State of Missouri v. Rebecca Matthews , No. WD79757, 552 S.W.3d 543, 2018 WL 1472766 (Mo. App. W.D. March 27, 2018), and remanded her case for a new trial. We reversed in Rebecca Matthews' case based on our conclusion that, during her trial, the circuit court erroneously admitted a large amount of irrelevant and highly prejudicial evidence concerning the exotic and dangerous reptiles kept in the Matthews home. Although Matthews and his wife were tried separately, much of the same irrelevant and inflammatory reptile evidence was admitted in his trial. Thus, we reverse Matthews' convictions and remand the case for a new trial, for the same reasons which justified our reversal in Rebecca Matthews' direct appeal.

Factual Background

At the time of the underlying conduct, Matthews and Rebecca Matthews1 lived in Richmond with their four children. Their oldest daughter, Karen,2 was four years old at the time; daughter Sara was two years old; and their son Leon was one year old. In addition to their three infants, Matthews and Rebecca had a three-week-old newborn, daughter Alice.

On the morning of August 18, 2012, Matthews was helping family friend April Mohn prepare for an event at an outdoor park. Matthews received a phone call from Rebecca, telling him that Alice had died. Matthews told Mohn that "we have to go back to my house now." On the way, Mohn called 9-1-1.

When Mohn and Matthews arrived at the home, Matthews jumped out of Mohn’s car and ran inside. When Mohn walked in, she found baby Alice in Rebecca’s arms, wrapped in a blanket. Mohn took the baby, who was cold to the touch. Moments later, paramedics arrived and found Mohn on the porch holding Alice. Paramedic Gary Hall took the baby and opened the blanket that she was wrapped in. Hall reported that he checked Alice for a pulse and respiration, but detected neither. A cardiac monitor confirmed that Alice had no heart rhythms. Hall testified at trial that he did not perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation ("CPR") on the baby, nor did anyone perform CPR in his presence.

Detective Matt Peterson arrived at the scene while Hall was holding Alice on the porch. Peterson testified that he did not see anyone perform CPR on the infant. Peterson saw the Matthews' three other children running around the house. He described the children as "a little unkempt, dirty." When Peterson picked up Leon, feces spilled out of the child’s diaper. Peterson conducted interviews of medical personnel while he was on the scene. He determined that CPR had not been performed.

Following the medical examination, an ambulance transported Alice to a funeral home, where a forensic pathologist performed an autopsy. During his external examination, the pathologist found a small bruise and small scrape near the baby’s right ear. He also found a bruise on the lower part of the baby’s breast bone. The

552 S.W.3d 678

pathologist’s internal examination revealed bruising under the scalp; he "didn't expect to see any bruising because normally babies are carefully handled." The internal investigation also revealed that Alice had suffered serious organ damage: a tear in the left atrium of her heart; a tear in her liver; and bruising of the lungs. Alice’s heart had leaked a small amount of blood into her chest cavity. The pathologist also found healing rib fractures that were at least a week old.

The forensic pathologist initially concluded that Alice’s death was accidental, with her injuries caused by poorly performed CPR. After he was informed that CPR had not been performed on the child, the pathologist characterized Alice’s death as a homicide, with the cause of death being blunt force trauma to the chest causing heart failure.

Alice’s death was not the first occasion on which authorities had suspected abuse and neglect in the Matthews home. In fact, the Children’s Division of the Department of Family Services had received eleven "Hot Line"3 calls reporting Rebecca and Dennis Matthews for suspected child abuse and neglect between March 2010 and August 2012. Most of the calls claimed that the Matthews home was unsuitable for children, due to lack of running water and adequate food, and the presence of dangerous animals in the home. The Matthews were also reported due to alleged sexual abuse and neglect.

On September 22, 2011, the State implemented a safety plan after an investigator determined that the Matthews home had inadequate food, no diapers for their baby, no running water, and dangerous reptiles present in the home (large snakes, lizards, and alligators). At least one of the reptiles had escaped its cage. The safety plan called for the children to stay with a family member or friend until the investigator could ensure that the house was safe for their return. But the investigator returned 24 hours later to find the family still in the home even though the dangerous conditions had not been remedied, in direct violation of the safety plan. Two weeks later, the investigator returned and found that the home had been brought into compliance. Food and diapers were present, the home had running water, and the reptiles had been removed. None of the other "Hot Line" reports were substantiated after investigation.

Testimony during trial provided additional examples of possible abuse and neglect. For instance, the Matthews children were consistently described as being significantly underweight. A nurse practitioner testified that she monitored the children’s weight. Leon’s weight decreased dramatically over time. Although his weight was at one point above the 50th percentile on a growth chart, he later fell below the 1st percentile. Sara’s weight exhibited a similar trajectory: she only gained 8 ounces in the 11 months after her first birthday, putting her at the 1st percentile at the age of 23 months in August 2012. The nurse testified that, whenever the Matthews children would visit her office, they would arrive hungry. The nurse regularly fed the children, and she reported that they ate well. Although the nurse referred Leon and Sara to a clinic for children experiencing failure to thrive, their parents never took them there.

In addition to malnourishment, Leon went to the hospital in May 2012 for a broken arm. April Mohn testified during trial that Leon purportedly fell off the bed while being watched by a family member. A nurse practitioner testified that Leon

552 S.W.3d 679

suffered a transverse fracture across both bones in the forearm. She testified that it was not the type of injury she would expect to see from a non-mobile infant falling out of a bed. The nurse also testified that Leon’s lower extremities exhibited low muscle tone. She testified that, when she held Leon up, he would not put any weight on his legs, which she considered to be unusual behavior for an eight-month-old child. The nurse diagnosed Leon with failure to thrive based on his weight, and testified that she also "had concerns for physical abuse and neglect."

After receiving the results of Alice’s autopsy, police officers picked up Matthews on August 28, 2012, and transported him to the Richmond Police Department. Matthews waived his Miranda4 rights and agreed to speak with the police. Detective Matt Peterson testified that Matthews was "very relaxed," which the detective viewed as unusual given that the interview took place only 10 days after Alice’s death. Detective Peterson testified that Matthews' behavior exhibited signs of possible deceitfulness.

Matthews told the police that the family had attended church the evening before Alice was found dead. That evening he stayed outside the house until one-thirty or two o'clock in the morning, chatting with a new male friend whom he had met at church. Matthews said that Rebecca had come out several times, urging him to come in and give the kids "lovins" and tuck them into bed. He declined, and instead stayed outside. When Matthews finally came inside, he said that he went straight to bed. Matthews said that both he and his wife slept in the living room, because they did not have baby monitors, and they otherwise could not hear Alice crying. Matthews...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 11 February 2020
    ...; State v. Sykes , 569 S.W.2d 258 (Mo. App. S.L. 1978) ; State v. Gantt , 644 S.W.2d 656 (Mo. App. W.D. 1982) ; State v. Matthews , 552 S.W.3d 674 (Mo. App. W.D. 2018) ; State v. Allen , 274 S.W.3d 514 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008). Here, Campbell has failed to develop a legal basis that would suppo......
  • C.A.R.A. v. Jackson Cnty. Juvenile Office (In re Interest of C.A.R.A.)
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 6 July 2021
    ...allegation, not merely a new trial, we consider Point I despite our disposition of Points II and III. See, e.g., State v. Matthews, 552 S.W.3d 674, 681 n.6 (Mo. App. W.D. 2018) (despite reversal for new trial based on erroneous admission of evidence, separately considering a criminal defend......
  • State v. Schurle
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 7 September 2021
    ... ... Because Schurle's sufficiency-of-the-evidence argument ... would entitle him to broader relief than his right-to-counsel ... arguments, we consider Point I despite our disposition of his ... remaining claims. See, e.g. , State v ... Matthews , 552 S.W.3d 674, 681 n.6 (Mo. App. W.D. 2018); ... State v. Feldt , 512 S.W.3d 135, 154- 55 (Mo. App ... E.D. 2017) ... When considering the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, ... this Court must determine whether sufficient evidence permits ... a reasonable ... ...
  • Kalakovic v. Dugan, WD 80767
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 17 April 2018

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT