State v. Miller
Decision Date | 14 February 2018 |
Docket Number | Appellate Case 2015-002664,2018-UP-086 |
Court | Court of Appeals of South Carolina |
Parties | The State, Respondent, v. James B. Miller, Appellant. |
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Submitted January 1, 2018
Appeal From Lexington County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of Columbia, and Solicitor Samuel R. Hubbard, III, of Lexington, for Respondent.
James B. Miller appeals his convictions for possession of altered pseudoephedrine and manufacturing methamphetamine. On appeal Miller argues the trial court erred by (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence found at the crime scene and (2) denying his motion for a mistrial. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b) SCACR, and the following authorities:
1. As to whether the trial court erred in denying Miller's motion to suppress: State v. Taylor, 360 S.C. 18 23, 598 S.E.2d 735, 737 (Ct. App. 2004) (); State v. Moore, 377 S.C. 299, 306, 659 S.E.2d 256, 259-60 (Ct. App. 2008) (); State v. Missouri, 361 S.C. 107, 112, 603 S.E.2d 594, 596 (2004) (); State v. Robinson, 396 S.C. 577, 584, 722 S.E.2d 820, 823 (Ct. App. 2012) ; Flowers, 360 S.C. at 5, 598 S.E.2d at 728 (); State v. Counts, 413 S.C. 153, 172, 776 S.E.2d 59, 70 (2015) ( ); Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229, 232 (2011) ( ).
2. As to whether the trial court erred in denying Miller's motion for a mistrial: State v. Bantan, 387 S.C 412, 417, 692 S.E.2d 201, 203 (Ct. App. 2010) (); id. (); id. (); State v. Harris, 382 S.C. 107, 119, 674 S.E.2d 532, 538 (Ct. App. 200...
To continue reading
Request your trial