State v. Munn, 22742
| Decision Date | 05 May 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 22742,22742 |
| Citation | 292 S.C. 497,357 S.E.2d 461 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | The STATE, Respondent, v. James Coker MUNN, Appellant. . Heard |
James C. Cox, Jr. of Saleeby, Cox & Beldsoe, P.A., Hartsville, and Ronald M. Childress of Childress and Mille, Columbia, for appellant.
Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Attys. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Amie L. Clifford, Columbia, and Solicitor J. Dupre Miller, Bennettsville, for respondent.
Appellant was convicted of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree. We reverse and remand.
Appellant was indicted for criminal sexual conduct in the second degree pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 16-3-653 (1976). The trial judge charged the jury, however, only on criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the second degree pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 16-3-655(3) (1976). The jury returned a verdict of guilty.
A defendant in a criminal case is entitled to be tried only on the charges set forth in the indictment. S.C.Code Ann. § 17-19-10 (1976). The test of sufficiency of an indictment is whether or not it contains the necessary elements of the offense intended to be charged and sufficiently apprises the defendant of what he must be prepared to defend. S.C.Code Ann. § 17-19-20 (1976); State v. Tabory, 262 S.C. 136, 202 S.E.2d 852 (1974).
Criminal sexual conduct in the second degree, as set forth in the indictment, requires that an actor use aggravated coercion to accomplish sexual battery. The term "aggravated coercion" means that the sexual battery must occur under circumstances where the victim's consent is lacking. State v. Cox, 274 S.C. 624, 266 S.E.2d 784 (1980). Criminal sexual conduct with a minor in the second degree, the offense on which the jury was instructed, requires that an actor engage in a sexual battery with a victim who is at least fourteen years of age but less than sixteen years of age and the actor be in a position of familial, custodial, or official authority to coerce the victim to submit, or be older than the victim. Since Section 16-3-655(3) includes the additional element of an age requirement, it is not a lesser included offense of Section 16-3-653.
Appellant did not make an objection about this matter at trial. Defects in the indictment which are of such a fundamental character as to make the indictment wholly invalid are not subject to waiver by a defendant. 41 Am.Jur.2d Indictments and Informations § 299 (1968). Subject to certain minor exceptions not present here, the trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to convict a defendant for an offense when there is no indictment charging him with that offense when the jury is sworn. State v. Beachum, 288 S.C. 325, 342 S.E.2d 597 (1986); State v. Hann, 196 S.C. 211, 12 S.E.2d 720 (1940).
Appellant's "conviction" under Section 16-3-653 is reversed and remanded. There is no merit to appellant's argument that the state can not try him again. See Montana v. Hall, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 1825, 95 L.Ed.2d 354 (1987).
We wish to note for the benefit of the bench and bar that there is no rule allowing...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McGee v. Warden of Lieber Corr. Inst.
...324 (1998); Granger v. State, 333 S.C. 2, 507 S.E.2d 322 (1998); State v. Wade, 306 S.C. 70, 409 S.E.2d 780 (1991); State v. Munn, 292 S.C. 497, 351 S.E.2d 461 (1987); State v. Hardee, 279 S.C. 409, 308 S.E.2d 21 State v. Tabory, 262 S.C. 136, 202 S.E.2d 852 (1974); State v. McIntire, 221 S......
-
State v. Gentry
...this Court. Id. However, as was done by the Supreme Court in Bain, this Court broadened the meaning of jurisdiction in State v. Munn, 292 S.C. 497, 357 S.E.2d 461 (1987). Prior to Munn, the rule was that any objection to the sufficiency of the indictment, i.e. that the indictment was defect......
-
Cabbagestalk v. McFadden, : 5:14-cv-03771-RMG-KDW
...court room period. (See S.C. Code Ann. § 17-19-10 (1985) accord Hopkins v. State, 317 S.C. 7, 451 S.E.2d 389 (1994); State v. Munn, 292 S.C. 497, 357 S.E.2d 461 (1987), Browning v. State 320 S.C. 366, 465 S.E.2d 358 (1995), State v. Beachum, 288 S.C. 325 [last line illegible]Ground Eight: O......
-
Joseph v. State
...subsequent prosecution." State v. Owens, supra (citing State v. Owens, 293 S.C. 161, 165, 359 S.E.2d 275, 277 (1987);5 State v. Munn, 292 S.C. 497, 357 S.E.2d 461 (1987) (test of sufficiency of indictment is whether it contains necessary elements of offense intended to be charged and suffic......