State v. Murphy

Decision Date24 October 2019
Docket NumberNo. 107836,107836
Citation2019 Ohio 4347
PartiesSTATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALLEN D. MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtOhio Court of Appeals

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED

Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

Case No. CR-18-625470-A

Appearances:

Michael C. O'Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronnie Ducoff, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Mark A. Stanton, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Paul A. Kuzmins, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

ANITA LASTER MAYS, J.:

I. Background and Facts

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Allen D. Murphy ("Murphy") appeals his jury convictions for Counts 1 and 2, rape, R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), a first-degree felony; Count 3, rape, R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), a first-degree felony; Count 4, kidnapping, R.C. 2905.01(A)(4), a first-degree felony, with a sexual motivation specification, R.C. 2941.147; and Count 5, disseminating matter harmful to juveniles, R.C. 2907.31(A)(1), a fourth-degree felony.

{¶ 2} The victim of the offenses, Murphy's stepdaughter Jane Doe ("Doe"), was nine years old at the time of the October 2016 incident and 11 years old at the time of the August 27, 2018 trial. Doe did not tell anyone about the interaction until visiting family in April 2017.

{¶ 3} The trial court denied Murphy's motion for judgment of acquittal under Crim.R. 29 proffered at the close of the evidence, and a guilty verdict was rendered on September 5, 2018. On September 27, 2018, Murphy was sentenced to a 25-year-to-life term of imprisonment with up to three years of discretionary postrelease control and was designated a Tier III child victim sex offender. Murphy also received jail-time credit for 23 days.

II. Assignments of Error

{¶ 4} Appellant presents nine assigned errors:

I. Murphy's convictions are based on insufficient evidence where the government's primary witness "really does not know" whether the incident charged actually occurred.
II. Whether Murphy's convictions are against the manifest weight of the evidence.
III. Whether Murphy was denied a fair trial where the doctor was permitted to testify that he diagnosed the alleged victim as a victim of sexual abuse.
IV. Whether Murphy was denied a fair trial where the government solicited testimony that its social worker found the underlying allegations to be "substantiated."
V. Whether the trial court erred by not allowing Murphy to develop the fact that the girlfriend of Doe's father had a history of speaking with young children about sexual matters.
VI. Whether the trial court erred in allowing the government to introduce evidence of Murphy's willingness to take a polygraph test and then impeach that same statement.
VII. Whether the trial court erred in allowing the government to introduce statements on whether Murphy viewed pornography on his cellular phone and then impeach that same statement.
VIII. Whether Murphy was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial.
IX. Whether Murphy was denied a fair trial when he was precluded from cross-examination of the government's expert about prior sexual abuse of the alleged victim.

III. Discussion

{¶ 5} The indictment filed on February 1, 2018, charged Murphy with performing cunnilingus, anal penetration, and vaginal penetration of Doe at the time of the incident which the indictment listed as occurring between October 1, 2016, and December 1, 2016. The sexual activity was accompanied by a kidnapping charge due to the restraint of liberty and a charge for exhibiting obscene material to Doe.

A. Sufficiency of the Evidence

{¶ 6} The question of whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction involves a determination of whether the state has met its burden of production at trial. State v. Hunter, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 86048, 2006-Ohio-20, ¶ 41, citing State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 390, 678 N.E.2d 541 (1997). An appellate court does not weigh the evidence but determines "'whether,after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.'" State v. Leonard, 104 Ohio St.3d 54, 2004-Ohio-6235, 818 N.E.2d 229, ¶ 77, quoting State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259, 574 N.E.2d 492 (1991), paragraph two of the syllabus.

{¶ 7} Murphy was convicted of rape under R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), kidnapping pursuant to R.C. 2905.01(A)(4) with a sexual motivation specification (R.C. 2941.147), and disseminating matter harmful to juveniles under R.C. 2907.31(A)(1). R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) provides:

No person shall engage in sexual conduct with another who is not the spouse of the offender or who is the spouse of the offender but is living separate and apart from the offender, when any of the following applies: * * * (b) The other person is less than thirteen years of age, whether or not the offender knows the age of the other person.

{¶ 8} R.C. 2907.01(A) defines sexual conduct to include:

the insertion, however slight, of any part of the body or any instrument, apparatus, or other object into the vaginal or anal opening of another. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete vaginal or anal intercourse.

{¶ 9} Kidnapping under R.C. 2905.01(A)(4) states that:

(A) No person, by force, threat, or deception, or, in the case of a victim under the age of thirteen or mentally incompetent, by any means, shall remove another from the place where the other person is found or restrain the liberty of the other person, for any of the following purposes: * * * (4) [t]o engage in sexual activity, as defined in section 2907.01 of the Revised Code, with the victim against the victim's will.

{¶ 10} R.C. 2907.31(A)(1) prohibits disseminating matter harmful to juveniles:

(A) No person, with knowledge of its character or content, shall recklessly do any of the following:
(1) Directly sell, deliver, furnish, disseminate, provide, exhibit, rent, or present to a juvenile * * * any material or performance that is obscene or harmful to juveniles.

{¶ 11} Murphy claims that the evidence is insufficient to support the convictions as a matter of law because Doe does not really know whether the incident really occurred and that there is little to no evidence that corroborates Doe's memory. Murphy offers that the conviction is insufficient as a matter of law. We disagree with Murphy's conclusion.

{¶ 12} The testimony reflects that Doe lived with her mother, sisters, and "Daddy Murph," as she referred to Murphy. (Tr. 401.) In April 2017, Doe was visiting the home of her paternal grandmother where her natural father resided with his girlfriend and several of Doe's half-siblings. It was at that time that Doe stated that she had been molested by Murphy in October 2016, about the time of her sister's birthday.

{¶ 13} The paternal grandmother reported the incident to 696-KIDS. Doe said that she was afraid to tell anyone because her mother would be upset and Murphy would take her cell phone away. At that time, Doe had moved from Cleveland to Portage County where her mother was caring for the maternal grandfather. Social workers and police in Portage County and in Cleveland became involved and Murphy was instructed to leave the home.

{¶ 14} Murphy cites Doe's August 2017 statement to her mother that the incident seemed like a dream broached during cross-examination:

Counsel: And what made you question whether or not what you thought had occurred? What made you question that?
Witness: Because finally like my heart and my instincts were telling me like it didn't happen. And then like my head was telling me it did happen.
Counsel: Did you say something about a dream?
Witness: Yeah. Like it could have been a dream. Because like if I — like — well, this happened a couple years ago when my mom and my dad were together. Like they would like say that we went to — like we would go to boot camp, but we really didn't. Then I like had a like dream and then I found out like a couple months later once I told my mom I thought it happened, and she finally told me that it didn't happen.
Counsel: Is that something that's happened to you on more than one occasion? Has that happened with other things?
Witness: It was just that thing.
Counsel: Sometimes you have a dream or sometimes you think something happened and it really didn't?
Witness: Yes.
Counsel: What do you think with respect to what you said your stepdad did to you? What do you think, did happen or did it not happen?
Witness: Um, I really don't know.
Counsel: Okay. And you went to the doctor's, right?
Witness: Yes.
Counsel: And did they tell you that were okay?
Witness: Yes.
Counsel: Do you miss your stepdad?
Witness: Um, yeah.
Counsel: Has anybody made you say what you just told me?
Witness: No.

(Tr. 417-419.)

{¶ 15} During redirect examination, Doe recounted a situation that occurred when she was much younger where she thought that she recalled going to boot camp with her biological parents but she later learned that it did not happen. Doe said the situation was "I like had a like dream." (Tr. 418.)

State: Is that something that's happened to you on more than one occasion? Has that happened with other things?
Witness: It was just that thing.

(Tr. 418.)

{¶ 16} Doe then explained:

State: You said your heart told you that it didn't happen but your mind told you it did?
Witness: Yes.
State: Is it hard for you to accept that all those things happened?
Witness: Um, kind of?
State: Are they bad memories?
Counsel: Objection, Your Honor.
Court: Overruled.
State: Did you understand the question?
Witness: No.
State: Stuff you — when you described his private in your front private, is that one of your happy memories or bad memories?
Witness: Like a bad memory.
State: What about when his private is going into your back private and his hands are pulling apart your butt cheeks? Is that a good memory or a bad memory?
Witness: A bad memory.
* * *
State: When you said his tongue was on your vagina —
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT