State v. Norman
Decision Date | 20 November 1896 |
Parties | The State v. Norman, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Boone Circuit Court. -- Hon. John A. Hockaday, Judge.
Reversed and remanded.
Webster Gordon for appellant.
The assault attempted to be charged in this case, being a felony it was indispensable that the indictment should charge that the act, to wit, the assault, was done with a felonious intent, which it fails to do, hence is fatally defective. State v. Wood, 124 Mo. 412; State v Fairlamb, 121 Mo. 137; State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516; State v. Herrill, 97 Mo. 105; State v Emerich, 87 Mo. 110; 2 Bishop, Crim. Proc., secs. 79, 651, 653. The assault, coupled with the intent, constitutes the felony. State v. Doyle, 107 Mo. 36; Bishop's Crim. Law [6 Ed.], sec. 206. In an indictment for a felony nothing material shall be taken by intendment or implication. State v. Green, 111 Mo. 585; State v. Myers, 99 Mo. 107.
R. F. Walker, attorney general, for the state.
This case must be reversed because the indictment is defective in not charging that the assault was with a felonious intent. State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 519.
The defendant, a negro, was indicted for shooting one Fred. Johnson, another son of Ham, in the back with a pistol, and being tried was found guilty and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. From judgment and sentence on the verdict he appeals to this court.
The substantial portion of the indictment is the following:
The attorney general admits the indictment insufficient, because of not charging that the assault was made with a felonious intent. Correct. State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516, 13 S.W. 819, and cases cited; State v. Fairlamb, 121 Mo. 137, 25 S.W. 895; State v. Wood, 124 Mo. 412, 27 S.W. 1114.
The insufficiency of the indictment renders the decision of any other...
To continue reading
Request your trial