State v. Park, 4615
| Decision Date | 22 March 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 4615,4615 |
| Citation | 50 Haw. 275,439 P.2d 212 |
| Court | Hawaii Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Hawaii v. Yvonne Puanani PARK. |
Syllabus by the Court
1. A contemporaneous search incidental to a lawful arrest may be made for the fruits of the crime, implements used to commit the crime and for weapons.
2. In making a search after a lawful arrest, officers may seize evidence of a crime different from the offense for which the arrest was made.
John R. Desha, II, Honolulu, for defendant-appellant.
Harold Fong and Victor Agmata, Jr., Deputy Pros. Attys. , for the State.
Before RICHARDSON, C. J., and MIZUHA, MARUMOTO, ABE and LEVINSON, JJ.
Defendant appeals from a conviction of a charge of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug. The sole question for decision in this case is whether the search of defendant-appellant's handbag in which marijuana cigarettes were discovered was incidental to a lawful arrest.
Officer Joseph Saromines, while assigned as an undercover police officer with the Honolulu Police Department, was an invited guest at 635 Ahakea Street. While at said address, he observed a gambling game in operation. Officer Saromines effected an arrest on all persons in a room at the above address for being present at a gambling game, at the same time when other officers entered the home and arrested the host and occupant of the premises under two warrants of arrest. Defendant was observed participating in the gambling game and was one among others who were arrested for being present at a gambling game. In the presence of the arresting officer, another officer searched the purse belonging to defendant for gambling paraphernalia and weapons and while doing so, the marijuana cigarettes were recovered.
A police officer may make an arrest without a warrant when the misdemeanor is committed in his presence. Territory v. Hoo Koon, 22 Haw. 597 (1915). The evidence is uncontroverted in this case that a gambling game was in operation and that the arresting officer observed the game and the participants. Defendant testified that she had fifty dollars worth of chips.
There is no question that there was probable cause to effect an arrest. See Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307, 79 S.Ct. 329, 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959); Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949). A contemporaneous search incidental to a lawful arrest may be made for the fruits of the crime, implements used to commit the crime and for weapons. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 34 S.Ct. 341, 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914); Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, 46 S.Ct. 4, 70 L.Ed. 145 (1925); United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653 (1950); Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364, 84 S.Ct. 881, 11 L.Ed.2d 777 (1964).
An officer's right to search after a lawful arrest applies not only to felony arrests, but also applies to misdemeanor arrests where the accused is lawfully taken into custody. United States v. Snyder, 278...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Ortiz, 8636
...Constitution. Kaluna, 55 Haw. at 371, 520 P.2d at 59-60. The Kaluna court, however, reaffirmed its prior decision in State v. Park, 50 Haw. 275, 439 P.2d 212 (1968), where it had upheld the warrantless search of the defendant's handbag and seizure of marijuana cigarettes found therein follo......
-
State v. Melear
...the arrestee from escaping. State v. Barnes, supra; State v. Hanawahine, 50 Haw. 461, 464, 443 P.2d 149, 151-52 (1969); State v. Park, 50 Haw. 275, 439 P.2d 212 (1968). The search must be no broader than is absolutely necessary to accomplish the purposes for which such searches are permitte......
-
State v. Powell
...is being, or has been, committed in his presence. House v. Ane, 56 Haw. 383, 390, 538 P.2d 320, 325 (1975); State v. Park, 50 Haw. 275, 276, 439 P.2d 212, 213 (1968). At the time of this arrest appellee and Officer Weissich were standing at the rear of appellee's automobile where they were ......
-
State v. Kaluna
...State and their applicability to the facts of this case. A. Search Incident to a Lawful Arrest As we generalized in State v. Park, 50 Haw. 275, 276, 439 P.2d 212, 213 (1968), '(a) contemporaneous search incidental to a lawful arrest may be made for the fruits of the crime, implements used t......