State v. Parks
| Decision Date | 07 April 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 795P85,795P85 |
| Citation | 316 N.C. 384,342 S.E.2d 904 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory Kent PARKS. |
Loflin & Loflin, Durham, for defendant.
Myron C. Banks, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for State.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. § 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of April 1986."
Therefore, it is considered and adjudged further that Defendant do pay the sum of Nine and no/100 Dollars ($9.00) and that execution issue therefor.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
In The Matter Of L.I.
... ... Heard in the Court of Appeals 24 March 2010.Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Mabel Y. Bullock, for the State.James N. Freeman, Jr., Elkin, for juvenile-appellant.HUNTER, ROBERT C., Judge. Juvenile L.I. appeals from the trial court's orders ... State v. Parks, 77 N.C.App. 778, 781, 336 S.E.2d 424, 426 (1985), ... appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 316 N.C. 384, 342 S.E.2d 904-05 (1986). “In that ... ...
-
In re M.L.T.H.
... ... Attorney General Roy A. Cooper, III, by Special Deputy Attorney General Gail E. Dawson, for the State ... Kimberly P. Hoppin, Chapel Hill, for juvenile-appellant ... [685 S.E.2d 119] ... STROUD, Judge ... State v. Parks, 77 N.C.App. 778, 781, 336 S.E.2d 424, 426 (1985), disc. review denied, 316 N.C. 384, 342 S.E.2d 904-05 (1986). "In that event, the necessary ... ...
-
State v. Baldwin
... ... Although the general rule is that the trial court must make findings of fact and conclusions of law after hearing a motion to suppress, findings are not required if there is no material conflict in the evidence at the suppression hearing. State v. Parks, 77 N.C.App. 778, 781, 336 S.E.2d 424, 426 (1985), disc. review denied, 316 N.C. 384, 342 S.E.2d 904 (1986). In the present case, there was no dispute regarding the events of the search or the items seized. Because the conflict was in the interpretation of the scope of the search warrant and not a ... ...
- State v. Miller, No. COA06-1373 (N.C. App. 6/19/2007)
Request a trial to view additional results