State v. Pender

Decision Date12 October 1995
Docket NumberNo. 85042,85042
Parties20 Fla. L. Weekly S533 STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Kevin Walter PENDER, et al., Respondents.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal--Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fifth District--Nos. 93-1832 and 93-1942 (Orange County).

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; and Mark S. Dunn and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Pender v. State, 647 So.2d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinion in State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016 (Fla.1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, Sec. 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The decision below is quashed and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Schopp.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

HARDING, J., dissents with an opinion, in which OVERTON, J., concurs.

HARDING, Justice, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case for the reasons expressed in my dissent in State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016, 1022 (Fla.1995) (Harding, J., dissenting).

OVERTON, J., concurs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • C.D.B. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 3 November 1995
    ...defense's violation of a discovery rule results in exclusion of defense evidence without an adequate Richardson hearing. State v. Pender, 661 So.2d 304 (Fla.1995); O'Rourke v. State, 661 So.2d 800 (Fla.1995), aff'g O'Rourke v. State, 645 So.2d 569 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). "[I]n the vast majorit......
  • Pender v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 9 October 1997
    ...district court's decision and remanded for reconsideration in light of State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016 (Fla.1995). State v. Pender, 661 So.2d 304 (Fla.1995) (Pender II ). In Schopp, we overruled Smith and found the failure to conduct a Richardson hearing was no longer per se reversible but ......
  • Pender v. State, s. 93-1832
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 October 1996
    ...and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. 1 Pender v. State, 647 So.2d 957 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), review granted, 654 So.2d 920 (Fla.1995).2 State v. Pender, 661 So.2d 304 (Fla.1995). ...
  • The Florida Bar v. Warren, 84621
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 12 October 1995

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT