State v. Pimental
Decision Date | 21 November 2002 |
Docket Number | No. 538P02.,538P02. |
Citation | 573 S.E.2d 163,356 N.C. 442 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Jon Eric PIMENTAL. |
Rudolph A. Ashton, III, New Bern, for Pimental.
William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 568 S.E.2d 867.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st day of November 2002."
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Biddix
...from judgment entered upon his conviction. State v. Pimental, 153 N.C.App. 69, 72, 568 S.E.2d 867, 869, disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 442, 573 S.E.2d 163 (2002). A defendant's right to appeal in a criminal proceeding is entirely a creation of state statute. Id. The North Carolina General St......
-
State v. Mangum
...here. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444 ; State v. Pimental , 153 N.C. App. 69, 73, 568 S.E.2d 867, 870, disc. review denied , 356 N.C. 442, 573 S.E.2d 163 (2002). Rule 3(a) and binding Supreme Court precedents also prohibit this Court from granting Defendant's motion to amend the record of a ......
-
State v. Wolfe, No. COA08-38 (N.C. App. 4/7/2009)
...a criminal case is statutory in nature. State v. Pimental, 153 N.C. App. 69, 72, 568 S.E.2d 867, 869 (2002), dis. rev. den., 356 N.C. 442, 573 S.E.2d 163 (2002); State v. McBride, 120 N.C. App. 623, 624, 463 S.E.2d 403, 404 (1995), aff'd, 344 N.C. 623, 476 S.E.2d 106 (1996). "A defendant wh......
-
State v. Ledbetter
..."is purely a creation of state statute." State v. Pimental, 153 N.C.App. 69, 72, 568 S.E.2d 867, 869, disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 442, 573 S.E.2d 163 (2002) (citations omitted); N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A–1444 (2013). Absent express statutory authority, a criminal defendant does not have a state ......