State v. Pimental

Decision Date21 November 2002
Docket NumberNo. 538P02.,538P02.
Citation573 S.E.2d 163,356 N.C. 442
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Jon Eric PIMENTAL.

Rudolph A. Ashton, III, New Bern, for Pimental.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 568 S.E.2d 867.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st day of November 2002."

To continue reading

Request your trial
72 cases
  • State v. Biddix
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 15 Diciembre 2015
    ...from judgment entered upon his conviction. State v. Pimental, 153 N.C.App. 69, 72, 568 S.E.2d 867, 869, disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 442, 573 S.E.2d 163 (2002). A defendant's right to appeal in a criminal proceeding is entirely a creation of state statute. Id. The North Carolina General St......
  • State v. Mangum
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 3 Marzo 2020
    ...here. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444 ; State v. Pimental , 153 N.C. App. 69, 73, 568 S.E.2d 867, 870, disc. review denied , 356 N.C. 442, 573 S.E.2d 163 (2002). Rule 3(a) and binding Supreme Court precedents also prohibit this Court from granting Defendant's motion to amend the record of a ......
  • State v. Wolfe, No. COA08-38 (N.C. App. 4/7/2009)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 7 Abril 2009
    ...a criminal case is statutory in nature. State v. Pimental, 153 N.C. App. 69, 72, 568 S.E.2d 867, 869 (2002), dis. rev. den., 356 N.C. 442, 573 S.E.2d 163 (2002); State v. McBride, 120 N.C. App. 623, 624, 463 S.E.2d 403, 404 (1995), aff'd, 344 N.C. 623, 476 S.E.2d 106 (1996). "A defendant wh......
  • State v. Ledbetter
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 3 Noviembre 2015
    ..."is purely a creation of state statute." State v. Pimental, 153 N.C.App. 69, 72, 568 S.E.2d 867, 869, disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 442, 573 S.E.2d 163 (2002) (citations omitted); N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A–1444 (2013). Absent express statutory authority, a criminal defendant does not have a state ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT