State v. Pratt
| Decision Date | 05 June 2020 |
| Docket Number | No. 98066-7,98066-7 |
| Citation | 195 Wash.2d 1023,464 P.3d 231 (Table) |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Cory PRATT, Petitioner. |
ORDER
¶1 This case came before the Court on its June 4, 2020, En Banc Conference to consider the petition for review. A majority of the Court voted in favor of the following result:
¶4 That the petition for review is granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).
For the Court
/s/ Stephens, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
State v. Pratt
...for SSOSA. State v. Pratt , 11 Wash. App. 2d 450, 454 P.3d 875 (2019). Pratt filed a petition for review, which we granted. 195 Wash.2d 1023, 464 P.3d 231 (2020).ANALYSIS ¶ 6 Once a defendant has been convicted of a sex offense, the trial court has the discretion to impose a SSOSA sentence.......
-
State v. Spaulding
...is a matter of statutory interpretation. State v. Pratt , 11 Wash. App. 2d 450, 457, 454 P.3d 875 (2019), review granted , 195 Wash.2d 1023, 464 P.3d 231 (2020).3. Established Relationship or Connection ¶18 The trial court concluded that Spaulding did not have an established relationship wi......