State v. Rice
| Decision Date | 31 January 1877 |
| Citation | State v. Rice, 76 N.C. 194 (N.C. 1877) |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE v. SAMUEL RICE. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
INDICTMENT for Misdemeanor, tried at Fall Term, 1876, of ROWAN Superior Court, before Cloud, J.
The counsel for the defendant in the Court below moved to quash the bill of indictment, on the ground that the recitals therein did not constitute an indictable offence, either at common law or by statute. His Honor allowed the motion and the Solicitor for the State appealed.
Mr. W. H. Bailey and Attorney General, for the State .
No counsel for the defendant.
We think the Judge was right in quashing the indictment in this case.
The first count alleges that the defendant enticed Cornelius Correll, a servant of Alexander Correll, from the service of his master, &c. against the form of the statute, &c.
The statute referred to is chapter 70 of Battle's Revisal, and is evidently confined to servants by indenture or by contract in writing. No such contract is stated in this count, and for that reason it was defective.
All the other counts substantially charge that the defendant enticed the said Cornelius an infant from the service of his father the said Alexander, &c., and conclude at common law.
The learned counsel who represented the Attorney...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Khalifa v. Shannon
...that a father could bring the cause of action for any of his children: At the common law, abduction of a child was not an offense. State v. Rice, 76 N.C. 194. But Blackstone, 3 Com. 140, holds that a civil action lay therefor, and that a father could recover damages, though he says it was a......
-
Howell v. Howell
...106 N.C. 676, 11 S.E. 518; State v. Burnett, 142 N.C. 579, 55 S.E. 72). At the common law, abduction of a child was not an offense. State v. Rice, 76 N.C. 194. But Blackstone, 3 140, holds that a civil action lay therefor, and that a father could recover damages, though he says it was a dou......
-
Little v. Holmes
...action of the court below. In that case it was said that at common law it was true that "abduction of a child was not an offense" ( State v. Rice, 76 N.C. 194); but 3 Bl. Com. holds that a civil action lay therefor, and that a father could recover damages, though he says it "was a doubtful ......
- Parks v. Siler