State v. Sampson, 7522

Decision Date12 January 1996
Docket NumberDocket No. Y,No. 7522,7522
Citation669 A.2d 1326
PartiesSTATE of Maine v. Warren D. SAMPSON. DecisionLawor-95-144 .
CourtMaine Supreme Court

Michael P. Cantara, District Attorney, David Gregory, Alfred, for the State.

James P. Boone, Saco, for Defendant.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, and LIPEZ, JJ.

DANA, Justice.

Warren D. Sampson appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) on his conditional guilty plea pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Pamph.1994) (current version at 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411 (Pamph.1995)) (OUI). His conditional guilty plea preserved for appellate review the denial by the District Court (Biddeford, Cote, J.) of his motion to suppress evidence resulting from an investigatory stop of his vehicle. Sampson contends that the officer did not have an articulable suspicion to justify the stop. We disagree, and affirm the judgment.

Early one morning Officer Steven Garrison of the Saco Police Department was informed by his sergeant that "a possible drunk driver had just been through the drive-in window at Dunkin' Donuts, that the vehicle was headed northbound on Main Street, and that both subjects in the vehicle appeared to be intoxicated and had been drinking." The sergeant also told the officer that the vehicle was a dark-colored Dodge with Massachusetts license plate 493ACJ. The officer did not know the source of the sergeant's information.

As a result of this information Officer Garrison got in his cruiser and drove north on Main Street. Continuing north onto the Portland Road, he saw a dark-colored Dodge without a front license plate in a parking lot, approximately one-half to three-quarters of a mile from Dunkin' Donuts. The rear plate, however, did not match the description he had been given by the sergeant. He then observed a purple-colored Dodge in the parking lot and as he approached it to check the license plate the vehicle began moving. When the officer drove closer he saw that the license plate matched the description the sergeant had given him. He then turned on his vehicle's blue lights and stopped Sampson's vehicle. Before stopping Sampson's vehicle he did not observe anything unusual about the operation of the vehicle. Two or three minutes had elapsed from the time he received the information from his sergeant and the time he stopped Sampson's vehicle. The stop led to the subsequent arrest of Sampson for OUI.

Sampson moved to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the stop. Following a hearing the District Court denied the motion. From the judgment entered in the Superior Court on his conditional guilty plea, Sampson appeals. See M.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2).

An investigatory stop is justified if the officer at the time of the stop has " 'an articulable suspicion that criminal conduct has taken place, is occurring, or imminently will occur, and the officer's assessment of the existence of specific and articulable facts sufficient to warrant the stop is objectively reasonable in the totality of the circumstances.' " State v. Nelson, 638 A.2d 720, 722 (Me.1994) (quoting State v. Dulac, 600 A.2d 1121, 1122 (Me.1992)); see Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22, 88 S.Ct. 1868,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • McChesney v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • October 20, 1999
    ...v. Markus, 478 N.W.2d 405, 408-09 (Iowa Ct.App.1991); State v. Tucker, 19 Kan.App.2d 920, 878 P.2d 855, 862-64 (1994); State v. Sampson, 669 A.2d 1326, 1328 (Me.1996); Playle v. Commissioner of Pub. Safety, 439 N.W.2d 747, 748-49 (Minn. Ct.App.1989); State v. Melanson, 140 N.H. 199, 665 A.2......
  • People v. Wells
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • June 26, 2006
    ...1353; State v. Walshire (Iowa 2001) 634 N.W.2d 625, 627-630); State v. Slater (1999) 267 Kan. 694, 986 P.2d 1038, 1041-1046; State v. Sampson (Me.1996) 669 A.2d 1326; State v. Melanson (1995) 140 N.H. 199, 665 A.2d 338, 339-341; People v. Rance (1996) 227 A.D.2d 936, 644 N.Y.S.2d 447; Kaysv......
  • State v. Boyea
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • December 1, 2000
    ...upon anonymous call to police dispatcher regarding possible drunk driver and describing make and location of vehicle); State v. Sampson, 669 A.2d 1326, 1327 (Me.1996) (anonymous tip of "possible drunk-driver," together with vehicle description, provided reasonable suspicion sufficient to su......
  • U.S. v. Wheat
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • December 28, 2001
    ...probable cause to make an arrest. See, e.g., State v. Melanson, 140 N.H. 199, 200-03, 665 A.2d 338, 339-41 (1995); State v. Sampson, 669 A.2d 1326, 1327 (Me. 1996); State v. Lamb, 168 Vt. 194, 196-203, 720 A.2d 1101, 1102-06 (1998); State v. Slater, 267 Kan. 694, 696-706, 986 P.2d 1038, 104......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Search and seizure
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Attacking and Defending Drunk Driving Tests
    • May 5, 2021
    ...vehicle matched. See also State v. Walshire , 634 N.W. 2d 625 (Iowa 2001), State v. Slater , 986 P.2d 1038 (Kan.1999), State v. Sampson , 669 A.2d 1326 (Me. 1996), and State v. Boyea 765 A.2d 862 (Vt. 2000). §4:22 Identif‌ied Informants Courts give substantial leeway to informants who ident......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT