State v. Scanlan

Decision Date12 March 2018
Docket NumberNo. 74438-1-I,74438-1-I
Citation413 P.3d 82
CourtWashington Court of Appeals
Parties The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Theresa Gail SCANLAN, Appellant.

Nancy P. Collins, Washington Appellate Project, 1511 3rd Ave. Suite 701, Seattle, WA, 98101-3647 for Appellant.

Ann Marie Summers, King County Prosecutor's Office, Prosecuting Attorney King County, King Co Pros/App Unit Supervisor, W554 King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104 for Respondent.

PUBLISHED OPINION

Mann, J.

¶ 1 Theresa Scanlan appeals her convictions for assault in the second degree, felony violation of a court order, and unlawful imprisonment of Leroy Bagnell, her domestic partner. Scanlan contends that (1) the trial court erred in admitting testimonial statements made by Bagnell to medical treatment providers, (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the charge of unlawful imprisonment, and (3) her convictions for both felony violation of a no-contact order and assault in the second degree were based on the same course of conduct and violate double jeopardy.

¶ 2 We hold that because the primary purpose of Bagnell's statements to his treatment providers was for medical treatment, the admission of the statements did not violate Scanlan's rights under the confrontation clause. We further conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support

Scanlan's conviction for unlawful imprisonment. We therefore affirm Scanlan's convictions for assault in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment. However, we accept the State's concession and reverse Scanlan's conviction for felony violation of a no-contact order. We remand for resentencing on the crimes of assault in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment, and misdemeanor violation of a no-contact order.

FACTS

¶ 3 In 2013, Bagnell, an 82-year-old widower, was living independently in the Federal Way home that he had shared with his wife of more than 50 years. Sometime in 2013, Bagnell met Scanlan, a woman 30 years his junior. They quickly became friends and about two months later, Scanlan moved in with Bagnell.

¶ 4 On October 16, 2014, the Federal Way Police Department responded to Bagnell's home after receiving a 911 hang-up call. The officers found Bagnell and Scanlan inside the home. Scanlan was uninjured, but Bagnell, who was dressed in a t-shirt and underwear, had wounds

on his head, arms, and legs. After questioning Scanlan, the officers arrested her. As a result of the incident, a court order was issued prohibiting Scanlan from contacting Bagnell.

¶ 5 A few weeks later, on November 6, 2014, Bagnell's adult children grew concerned after Bagnell missed a scheduled meeting with them. After trying and failing to reach him on his cell phone and home phone, Bagnell's children went to Bagnell's house to check on him.

¶ 6 When Bagnell's children arrived at his house, they found it dark. Its blinds were drawn and all of the interior and exterior lights were out. The children thought this was odd and moved up to the front porch to try to see inside. From the porch they could see the glow of the television and shadowy movements. They rang the doorbell and knocked but received no answer. Bagnell's children were alarmed and opened the door with an emergency key.

¶ 7 Inside, they found Bagnell's home in disarray. Trails of blood ran across the carpet and up the stairs, gouges marked the walls, and broken household items and debris lay on the floor. A golf club leaned against a wall, and a hammer lay on a coffee table. A crowbar was on the dining room table, and a broken broom handle stood in a garbage bucket in the middle of the family room's floor. Bagnell sat alone in a chair in the family room, dazed, bleeding from several wounds

, and severely bruised such that "[h]is face was black." Bagnell at first appeared to be unconscious, but he began to respond to their attempts to rouse him as they called 911.

¶ 8 Roughly 15 minutes later, Federal Way Police Officer Brian Bassage arrived at Bagnell's home. Just as Officer Bassage arrived, Scanlan was found hiding under a blanket in the front seat of a car in the garage. As Officer Bassage removed her from the car, Bagnell's daughter yelled out at her that she had "just beat her father half to death, that there was blood everywhere." Scanlan shouted back, "It's not that bad."

¶ 9 At the police station, Scanlan claimed to be injured. The police took pictures, but did not detect any significant injuries. Scanlan did not receive medical treatment.

¶ 10 Bagnell was transported to the hospital where he was treated in the emergency room for his injuries which included: extensive bruising all over his body, four large open wounds

on his legs, wounds on his arms, and fractures on both hands. Bagnell was treated in the emergency room on November 6 by emergency room Nurse Catherine Gay and Dr. Robert Britt. Bagnell also met with social worker Jemina Skjonsby. After treatment, but prior to his release, Bagnell met with Federal Way Police Department Detective Adrienne Purcella from about midnight to 1:00 a.m. Bagnell signed a form medical records waiver at 12:55 a.m.

¶ 11 Bagnell did not testify at trial. However, the trial court admitted statements that Bagnell made to medical providers in the emergency room, as well as subsequent statements made to his primary care physician and wound

care medical team.

¶ 12 In November 2015, the State charged Scanlan with assault in the second degree (count 1), felony violation of a court order (count 2), unlawful imprisonment (count 3), and assault in the fourth degree (count 4). All counts contained a domestic violence allegation. The jury found Scanlan guilty of assault in the second degree, felony violation of a court order, and unlawful imprisonment. Scanlan appeals.

ANALYSIS
Right to Confrontation

¶ 13 Scanlan contends first that her right to confront the primary witness against her was violated. She argues that the trial court erred in admitting testimonial statements made by Bagnell to medical providers and two law enforcement officers.

A. Testimony of Medical Providers

¶ 14 The trial court allowed testimony from five medical providers concerning statements that Bagnell made to them during the course of treatment.

¶ 15 Nurse Gay was the first person to speak with Bagnell. Gay testified that when she asked Bagnell how he was injured, Bagnell told her that "his girlfriend had beaten him up, and that he'd had a no-contact order with that individual." Gay testified that when she asked Bagnell why his neck had a "ring mark around the back of [it]," Bagnell told her that "his girlfriend had ... tried to strangle him with his sweatshirt and had pulled the sweatshirt so hard, it had left this permanent ring around the back of his neck." Gay clarified during cross-examination that Bagnell had not used the word "strangled."

¶ 16 Dr. Britt, the emergency room doctor who treated Bagnell, testified that when he asked Bagnell what happened,

Bagnell responded that he had been imprisoned in his home for two days:

[Dr. Britt]: The patient did state that he had been in his home for two days, that he had been imprisoned, or at least held in his home against his will. He did state that he hadn't really eaten in a couple of days. He wasn't allowed to talk to his family.
[State]: And did he tell you about how he sustained his injuries?
[Dr. Britt]: He said that he was hit with fists, that he had been bitten in a couple of places and that he had been hit with a broom.

¶ 17 After Bagnell was medically cleared at about 9:00 p.m., an emergency room social worker named Jemina Skjonsby met with him. Skjonsby testified that when she asked him why he felt okay to return home, Bagnell told her "[t]hat he was relieved that this person had been removed from the home by police and that he wouldn't have to worry about it again."

¶ 18 On November 13, Bagnell met with his primary care physician Dr. Curtis Endow to follow up on his earlier injuries. Dr. Endow testified he observed that Bagnell had "[b]ruises, and swelling over the face, bruises over the upper chest, lower trunk and legs, and in the extremities, multiple bruising and open wounds

in various levels of—or depth of degree." Dr. Endow testified that as part of his treatment he asked Bagnell how he had been injured and that Bagnell responded that "he received the injuries during an assault" and that his girlfriend had assaulted him. Dr. Endow referred Bagnell to a wound care clinic for follow up care.

¶ 19 On November 18, Bagnell met with Stacy Friel, a physician's assistant at the wound

care clinic, about his wounds. Friel examined multiple wounds, including one wound on Bagnell's left arm, two wounds on his right arm, one wound on his right leg and three wounds on his left leg. Friel testified that as part of her treatment she asked Bagnell how he was injured and that he responded that he

"was living with a girlfriend at the time who had locked him in a room and had beat him with a candlestick, a broom, and a hammer over multiple areas."

¶ 20 On November 26, 2017, Bagnell returned to the wound

care clinic to see Dr. Jessica Pierce. As part of her treatment, Dr. Pierce asked Bagnell how his injuries happened. She testified that Bagnell told her his injuries were "a result of domestic violence," that "he was hit with a candlestick, a broom," and that he was "punched or hit [with] ... a hammer, something hard."

B. The Primary Purpose Test

¶ 21 A confrontation clause challenge is reviewed de novo. State v. Koslowski, 166 Wash.2d 409, 417, 209 P.3d 479 (2009).

¶ 22 "The Sixth Amendment provides that [i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him.’ " Koslowski, 166 Wash.2d at 417, 209 P.3d 479 (alterations in original) (quoting U.S. Const. amend. VI.) "[T]he Sixth Amendment's right of an accused to confront the witnesses against him ... is made obligatory on the States by the Fourteenth Amendment."

Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Scanlan
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • August 1, 2019
    ...Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford [v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004) ]." State v. Scanlan, 2 Wash. App. 2d 715, 725, 413 P.3d 82 (2018). In Crawford , the Supreme Court held that whether admission of an out-of-court statement by a declarant who does not t......
  • State v. Burke
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • December 27, 2018
    ...that the proper test is the primary purpose test.¶ 50 Division One of this court has recently addressed this issue in State v. Scanlan , 2 Wash. App. 2d 715, 413 P.3d 82, review granted , 191 Wash.2d 1026, 428 P.3d 1171 (2018). In Scanlan , Division One adopted the primary purpose test from......
  • State v. Ward
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • August 12, 2019
    ...The primary purpose test also applies in deciding whether such statements are testimonial.3 State v. Scanlan, 2 Wn. App.2d 715, 725, 413 P.3d 82 (2018), review granted, 191 Wn.2d 1026 (2018). Here, Dr. Drenguis stated the following on direct examination:Q. Now, going back to the -- the pati......
  • State v. Donato
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • August 20, 2018
    ...Streepy, 199 Wn. App. at 494. In addition, the recipient of the statements is highly relevant. State v. Scanlan, 2 Wn. App.2d 715, 728, 413 P.3d 82 (2018), petition for review filed, No. 95971-4 (Wash. June 18, 2018). "Statements made to someone who is not principally charged with uncoverin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT