State v. Shield, No. 84-112
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Iowa |
Writing for the Court | McCORMICK |
Citation | 368 N.W.2d 721 |
Docket Number | No. 84-112 |
Decision Date | 22 May 1985 |
Parties | STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Russell W. SHIELD, Appellant. |
Page 721
v.
Russell W. SHIELD, Appellant.
Page 722
Douglas E. Johnston, Muscatine, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Atty. Gen., and Valencia Voyd McCown, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Considered by McCORMICK, P.J., and McGIVERIN, SCHULTZ, CARTER, and WOLLE, JJ.
McCORMICK, Justice.
Defendant Russell W. Shield was convicted upon his guilty plea and sentenced for carrying a concealed weapon in violation of Iowa Code section 724.4 (1981). He alleged on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion in two respects in sentencing him. The court of appeals found merit in his allegation that it was impermissible for the court to lengthen his sentence before granting him work release. Because we disagree, we vacate the decision of the court of appeals and affirm the district court.
Carrying a concealed weapon is an aggravated misdemeanor. § 724.4. Defendant was therefore subject to a maximum sentence of imprisonment not to exceed two years, and a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars, or both. Iowa Code § 903.1(2) (Supp.1983). A determinate sentence for a period of one year or less was possible. Id.; State v. Erickson, 362 N.W.2d 528, 534 (Iowa 1985). Pursuant to that option, the sentencing court was also authorized to sentence defendant to a period in the county jail, suspend part of the sentence, and place defendant on probation. See § 356.47; Erickson, 362 N.W.2d at 534.
The trial court originally sentenced defendant to serve 120 days in the county jail, suspended all but thirty days of that term, placed defendant on probation for two years, and fined him $500. When defendant heard the sentence he immediately requested
Page 723
that he be given work release pursuant to section 356.26(1). See Iowa Code § 903.3 (Supp.1983). Among other provisions, section 356.26 authorizes the district court to grant a person sentenced to a county jail the privilege of leaving the jail "at necessary and reasonable hours" to work at the person's employment. Unless the court expressly grants the privilege at or after sentencing, the prisoner remains in ordinary confinement. § 356.27.When the defendant requested work release, the court said that if it were to grant work release defendant would have to serve a longer term in jail. The court offered defendant this choice:
THE COURT: How about double, like 60 instead of 30? If you would prefer that, I will do both.... Work release is about half the time in jail. It is a lot different than doing straight time.
....................
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Werts v. Iowa Bd. of Parole, 22-0127
...Iowa Code § 906.4(1). Ultimately, "[t]he parole decision is the exclusive prerogative of the board of parole." State v. Shield, 368 N.W.2d 721, 724 (Iowa 1985). Iowa's indeterminate sentencing scheme, the "ultimate determination of the length of sentence [Werts] will actually......
-
Werts v. Iowa Bd. of Parole, 22-0127
...Iowa Code § 906.4(1). Ultimately, "[t]he parole decision is the exclusive prerogative of the board of parole." State v. Shield, 368 N.W.2d 721, 724 (Iowa 1985). Iowa's indeterminate sentencing scheme, the "ultimate determination of the length of sentence [Werts] will actually......