State v. Sides

Decision Date30 April 1877
Citation64 Mo. 383
PartiesTHE STATE OF MISSOURI, Appellant, v. HENRY C. SIDES, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from McDonald County Circuit Court.

J. L. Smith, Att'y Gen'l, for Appellant.

It is not necessary in an indictment for murder to charge in what county the deceased died, or when he died The words of the indictment are susceptible of no other construction than that Martin died in the county of McDonald, and on the day before alleged in said indictment, to-wit: the 3rd day of February, 1873. (State vs. Harvey, 67 N. C. 467: State vs. Ryan, 13 Minn. 370.)

Bray & Cravens, for Respondent, cited: Chit. Cr. Law, 737; 2 Hale, 179; Cro. Eliz. 738.

NORTON, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in this case was indicted in the McDonald Circuit Court, at its February term, 1873, for murder, in killing one John Martin.

After various continuances of the cause, at the instance of defendant and on his motion and affidavit, a change of venue was awarded by the said circuit court, at its October term, 1874, to the circuit court of Newton county. Defendant filed in the latter court, at its February term, 1875, his motion to quash the indictment, which was sustained, and the defendant discharged. From this action of the court the State has appealed.

The causes assigned in the motion to quash are: 1st, because the record of the court does not show that the court appointed a foreman of the grand jury, or that there was any foreman of said grand jury; 2d, because the record does not show that there was the requisite number of men qualified to serve as grand jurors, when the indictment was filed in court; 3d, because the record does not show that said indictment was presented by the foreman in open court, in the presence of the grand jury; 4th, because the record does not show that Elijah Walker was qualified to serve as grand juror for McDonald county; 5th, because the indictment does not charge in what county or at what time John Martin died; 6th, because the record does not show the grand jurors were sworn as required by law.

We will only notice the fifth reason, assigned in the motion to quash the indictment, as all the other reasons assigned are not only extremely technical, but are unsustained by the record, which sufficiently shows that a foreman of the grand jury was appointed and sworn, together with fourteen other “good and lawful men,” and that the indictment in question was returned in open court, duly indorsed by the foreman in the presence of his fellow jurors.

The indictment charges in substance, that defendant with force and arms, at,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
33 cases
  • State v. Privett
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 10 Junio 1941
    ...the felonious assault, but also a felonious wounding, and that the wounds were mortal wounds which caused the death of N. C. Teroy. State v. Sides, 64 Mo. 383; v. Hagan, 164 Mo. 654; State v. Robertson, 178 Mo. 496; Kelly's Criminal Law (3 Ed.), sec. 484, p. 430. (2) It is necessary to prov......
  • The State v. Furgerson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 21 Mayo 1901
    ...they are essential, as already seen. [1 East P. C. 346; 2 Hale P. C. 184; State v. Lakey, 65 Mo. 217; State v. Steeley, 65 Mo. 218; State v. Sides, 64 Mo. 383.]" In case at bar the essential averments are properly connected by the following language: ". . . . one William Furgerson on the tw......
  • The State v. Kindred
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 21 Febrero 1899
    ...97 Mo. 108; State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 519; State v. Fairlambs, 121 Mo. 154. Indictments for murder require great strictness. State v. Sides, 64 Mo. 383; State v. 65 Mo. 217. (2) The court should have granted a continuance in this case. John Willeford was in the front part of the store at th......
  • State v. Houx
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 2 Febrero 1892
    ... ... act has never been so extended as to permit the omission from ... the indictment of a sufficiently [109 Mo. 659] distinct ... charge of every substantive fact necessary to constitute the ... offense. State v. Reakey, 62 Mo. 40; State v ... Sides, 64 Mo. 383 ...          The ... first count in the indictment is drawn under that part of ... section 1253, Revised Statutes, 1879, which makes it a ... capital offense to have carnal knowledge of a female child ... under twelve years of age, though accomplished without force, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT