State v. Storkey

Decision Date30 June 1868
Citation63 N.C. 7
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE v. HENRY STORKEY.
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

The Supreme Court has no power to grant a new trial because a verdict is found upon insufficient testimony, or against the weight of testimony. The sufficiency of the testimony offered is a question exclusively for the jury. Whether a verdict is against the weight of the testimony is a matter exclusively for the discretion of the Judge who presides at the trial.

It is not necessary, in North Carolina, to show emission in order to prove rape, even where the indictment concludes against the form of the Statute-- not “Statutes:” the 20th sec. of Rev. Code, chap. 35, having abolished all distinction between these phrases.

An indictment for rape need not charge that the person ravished is over ten years of age.

RAPE, tried before Warren, J., at Spring Term 1868, of the Superior Court of BEAUFORT.

No statement of the facts is necessary.

Attorney General, for the State .

Rodman, contra .

READE, J.

In the case made for this Court, the evidence is stated in detail as the basis of exceptions by the defendant, That the evidence was insufficient to satisfy a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, and, That their verdict was against the weight of testimony.

If there was any evidence, its sufficiency was a question for the jury, and, Whether the verdict was against the weight of the evidence was a question for the discretion of the Judge who presided at the trial. In neither case can this Court interfere. There was some evidence tending to show the defendant's guilt, and it may not be improper for us to say in support of the propriety of the conviction, that in our opinion it was plenary.

The defendant's second exception, that there was no proof of emission, cannot avail him. In the first place, the witness said that the defendant “penetrated her person and ravished her against her will.” That is evidence from which the jury might infer emission. But, in the second place, it is not necessary, under our Statute of 1860, chap. 30, to prove emission. This was probably not intended to be controverted by the prisoner's counsel. His objection probably is that the case is not governed by the Statute of 1860, because the indictment concludes, not against the Statutes but, against the ““Statute. But our act (Rev. Code, chap. 25, sec. 20,) provides that no indictment shall be vitiated by reason that it concludes against the Statutes, instead of against the Statute, or vice...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • GP, Matter of
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • March 22, 1984
    ...of the vulva or labia is sufficient. G.S. § 14-23; State v. Monds, 130 N.C. 697, 41 S.E. 789; State v. Hargrave, 65 N.C. 466; State v. Storkey, 63 N.C. 7; Burdick: Law of Crime, section 477; 44 Am.Jur., Rape, section 3; 52 C.J., Rape, sections 23, 24.' State v. Bowman, 232 N.C. 374, 61 S.E.......
  • Romulus v. Romulus
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 20, 2011
    ...is sufficient. G.S. 14–23; State v. Monds, 130 N.C. 697, 41 S.E. 789 [ (1902) ]; State v. Hargrave, 65 N.C. 466 [ (1871) ]; State v. Storkey, 63 N.C. 7 [ (1868) ]; Burdick: Law of Crime, section 477; 44 Am.Jur., Rape, section 3; 52 C.J. Rape, sections 23, 24.State v. Bowman, 232 N.C. 374, 3......
  • State v. Crawford, 361
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 27, 1963
    ... ... 209; State v. Marsh, 132 N.C. 1000, 43 S.E. 828, 67 L.R.A. 179; State v. Johnson, [260 N.C. 556] 226 N.C. 671, 40 S.E.2d 113. Our statute, G.S. § 14-21, also makes it rape carnally to know and abuse any female child under the age of twelve years, even though she consents. State v. Storkey, 63 N.C. 7, State v. Johnston, supra; State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Jones, 249 N.C. 134, 105 S.E.2d 513; State v. Strickland, 254 N.C. 658, 119 S.E.2d 781 ...         G.S. § 14-17 provides: 'A murder * * * which shall be committed in the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate any * * ... ...
  • State v. Primus
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 6, 1946
    ...makes it rape, carnally to know and abuse any female child under the age of twelve years, even though she consents. G.S. s 14-21; State v. Storkey, 63 N.C. 7. In other 'ravishing and carnally knowing any female of the age of twelve years or more by force and against her will' is rape; and '......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT