State v. Strong
| Decision Date | 08 May 1990 |
| Citation | 114 Wn.2d 1022,792 P.2d 533 |
| Parties | State v. Strong (Robert) NO. 56946-1 |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Appeal From: Court of Appeals No. 11179-9-II, 56 Wash.App. 715, 785 P.2d 464
Filed May 8, 1990.
Petition for Review: Denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
State v. Hopper
... ... First, Washington courts have frequently treated the Sixth Amendment and Const. art. 1, § 22 (amend. 10) as containing the same protection. See, e.g., Leach, 113 Wash.2d at 695, 782 P.2d 552; State v. Bergeron, 105 Wash.2d 1, 18 n. 41, 711 P.2d 1000 (1985); State v. Strong, 56 Wash.App. 715, 717, 785 P.2d 464, review denied, 114 Wash.2d 1022, 792 P.2d 533 (1990). Second, if anything, the United States Constitution's requirements are actually broader than the state protection. In addition to Sixth Amendment protection, providing a defendant with the right to ... ...
-
State v. Sly
... ... Strong, 56 Wash.App. 715, 785 P.2d 464, review denied, 114 Wash.2d 1022, 792 P.2d 533 (1990). The court in Strong held that despite the omission of a specific allegation of [794 P.2d 1320] intent, the information was not defective because it stated each of the statutory elements of robbery and also ... ...