State v. Summers
Decision Date | 05 October 2006 |
Docket Number | No. 358P06.,358P06. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Jasper Kalven SUMMERS. |
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of July 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."
To continue reading
Request your trial31 cases
-
State Carolina v. Brown
...viz., whether the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. State v. Summers, 177 N.C.App. 691, 697, 629 S.E.2d 902, 907 (“Once the trial court determines evidence is properly admissible under Rule 404(b), it must still determine if the p......
-
Dogwood Dev. & Mgmt. v. White Oak Transport
...standard of review as required by Rule 28(b)(6)), disc. rev. denied, 361 N.C. 690, 654 S.E.2d 248 (2007), with State v. Summers, 177 N.C.App. 691, 700, 629 S.E.2d 902, 908-09 (citing Viar to support dismissal of issue when appellant failed to brief standard of review as required by Rule 28(......
-
State v. May
...in admitting evidence of similar sex offenses by a defendant for the purposes now enumerated in Rule 404(b)[.]” State v. Summers, 177 N.C.App. 691, 696, 629 S.E.2d 902, 906,disc. review denied,360 N.C. 653, 637 S.E.2d 192 (2006) (citation and quotation marks omitted). Moreover, “evidence of......
-
State Of North Carolina v. Register, COA09-629.
...ruling is manifestly unsupported by reason.’ ” State v. Ray, --- N.C.App. ----, ----, 678 S.E.2d 378, 384 (quoting State v. Summers, 177 N.C.App. 691, 697, 629 S.E.2d 902, 907, appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 360 N.C. 653, 637 S.E.2d 192 (2006)), temporary stay allowed, 363 N.C. 5......
Request a trial to view additional results