State v. Turner, 39356
| Decision Date | 03 October 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 39356,39356 |
| Citation | 222 N.W.2d 105,192 Neb. 397 |
| Parties | STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Willie A. TURNER, Appellant. |
| Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
Circumstantial evidence to establish that possession of a controlled substance was with intent to distribute or deliver may consist of the quantity of the substance; the equipment and supplies found with it; the place it was found; the manner of packaging; and the testimony of witnesses experienced and knowledgeable in the field.
Frank B. Morrison, Public Defender, Thomas D. Carey, Stanley A. Krieger, Asst. Public Defenders, Omaha, for appellant.
Clarence A. H. Meyer, Atty. Gen., Harold Mosher, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, for appellee.
Heard before WHITE, C.J., and SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, NEWTON, CLINTON and BRODKEY, JJ.
The defendant was found guilty by a jury of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. He was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of 3 to 9 years. The defendant's contention on appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to establish an intent to distribute.
Shortly before noon on April 1, 1973, police officers executed a search warrant at an apartment in Omaha, Nebraska. Upon entering the apartment, the officers observed the defendant and a companion, both of whom were holding hypodermic needles to their arms. The substance in the two syringes was later identified as heroin. On a coffee table directly in front of the defendant and his companion there was an envelope with 15 packets of heroin and 1 packet of a white powder. The individuals were arrested and the officers conducted a search of the apartment. In a drawer in the kitchen the officers found a brown paper sack. It contained 7 cartons and a small bottle of a substance called dormin; a package of 1,000 staples; 13 envelopes; a stapler; a strainer; scissors; and a small measuring utensil. The officers also found another brown paper sack that contained 431 tinfoil squares.
There was testimony that dormin is commonly used to dilute heroin in preparation for street sale and that the other items were also of the sort commonly and regularly used in preparing and packaging heroin for street sale. There was also testimony that the occupants of the apartment, including the defendant, were all users of heroin and that the 15 or 16 packets of heroin actually seized would last an addict only 1 or 2 days.
The defendant's contention is that possession of a controlled...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Oldfield
...evidence." State v. Hoffman, 227 Neb. 131, 141, 416 N.W.2d 231, 237 (1987); State v. Blue Bird, supra. In State v. Turner, 192 Neb. 397, 399, 222 N.W.2d 105, 106 (1974), this court Circumstantial evidence to establish that possession of a controlled substance was with intent to distribute o......
-
State v. Lonnecker
...experienced and knowledgeable in the field." State v. Oldfield, supra 236 Neb. at 445, 461 N.W.2d at 562 (quoting State v. Turner, 192 Neb. 397, 222 N.W.2d 105 (1974)). Accord State v. Zitterkopf, A defendant possesses a controlled substance when the defendant knows of the nature or charact......
-
State v. Rathburn
...was separately packaged in a small plastic bag. Intent to distribute may be inferred from circumstantial evidence. State v. Turner, 192 Neb. 397, 222 N.W.2d 105 (1974). While the quantity seized is not the only criterion in raising a permissible inference of intent, it is relevant along wit......
-
State v. Thomas
...and knowledgeable in the field." State v. Oldfield, 236 Neb. 433, 445, 461 N.W.2d 554, 562 (1990) (quoting from State v. Turner, 192 Neb. 397, 222 N.W.2d 105 (1974)). See, also, State v. Lonnecker, 237 Neb. 207, 465 N.W.2d 737 (1991); State v. Harney, 237 Neb. 512, 466 N.W.2d 540 (1991); St......